Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Where's the evidence?—Making the case for public health

Bibliographic Data

ID11177891
AuthorsRabbi Julia Neuberger (King's Fund, corresponding author)
Year2001
Volume55
Issue2
Pages77-78
Publication date2001-02-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0143-005X • E-ISSN: 1470-2738
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/jech.55.2.77
PMID11154243
OpenAlexW2130182402
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Tackling health inequalities has become a cornerstone of British government policy. From the corridors of Whitehall to the local board meetings of primary care groups and trusts, the imperative to reduce the health gap between rich and poor is ubiquitous. Yet when action is proposed to turn the rhetoric into reality, particularly when significant investments are required, the cry of “not enough evidence” is invariably heard in opposition. Over the past decade, evidence-based practice has, quite properly, become a mantra of modern medicine. With the National Institute for Clinical Excellence and the Commission for Health Improvement now in place, medical practice in the NHS cannot get away with being anything other than evidence-based. The problem, though, is that the evidence most readily accepted within the health system comes from scientific methodologies like randomised control trials, which may not be the most appropriate forms of research into health improvement activities like community development, smoking cessation and rehabilitation. The growing understanding that health should be seen holistically—as being more about general wellbeing than the absence of disease—has not yet been equipped with evidence that policymakers and practitioners can respect. Throughout the history of the NHS, there has been a tension between the imperative to treat disease in the individual and the need to promote general good health in the population. The two activities have invariably clashed over access to resources and demand on health workers' time. On some occasions, they have come into a more direct conflict, for example during the current arguments about the safety of the MMR vaccine and

Alternative medicine · Cornerstone · Environmental health · Evidence-based medicine · Excellence · Health care · Health promotion · Mantra · Political science · Population · Population health · Public health · Public relations · Scientific evidence · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Public Administration · Health Policy

  • A population perspective to evidence based medicine

    Richard F Heller, J Page•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2002

  • From rhetoric to reality

    Open Access•Dina Berkeley, Jane Springett•Social Science & Medicine•2006

Citations per year0.08
Citation span2002 - 2006 (5)
Highly citedNo
Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae