Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communities

Datos Bibliográficos

ID11178583
AutoresMario Schootman (0000-0003-1162-8824, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, autor de correspondencia), Donna B Jeffe (0000-0002-7642-3777, Barnes-Jewish Hospital), Elizabeth A Baker (0000-0002-5306-4767, Saint Louis University), Mark S Walker (0000-0002-3276-2689, Barnes-Jewish Hospital)
Año2006
Volumen60
Número3
Páginas202-207
Fecha de publicación2006-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0143-005X • E-ISSN: 1470-2738
EditorialBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/jech.2005.041020
PMID16476748
PMCIDPMC2465556
OpenAlexW2165815383
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas16
Referencias citadas34

Study objective: To analyse the contextual effect of area poverty rate on never having been screened for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer by (1) describing the extent of the variation in screening behaviours among 98 US metropolitan areas; (2) determining if the variation in lack of screening can be explained by differences in the characteristics of the persons who resided in these areas; and (3) determining if living in a metropolitan area with a higher poverty rate increased the likelihood of never having been screened for cancer over and above individual characteristics. Design: Cross sectional survey using data from the 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Multilevel logistic regression included both individual level factors as well as area poverty rate. Setting: Ninety eight areas across the USA. Participants: Over 118 000 persons residing in 98 areas; a sample aimed at estimating 48.3% of the US population age 18 or older. Main results: After adjustment for individual level factors, increasing area level poverty rate (per 5%) remained associated with never having had a mammogram (odds ratio (OR) = 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03 to 1.37); clinical breast examination (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.48), colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.19), and a faecal occult blood test (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.27). Poverty rate was not independently associated with never having had a Pap smear (OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.41). The size of the variance among metropolitan or micropolitan statistical areas (MMSAs) varied by type of screening test, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 4.9% (never having had a Pap smear) to 1.2% (never having had a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy). Conclusions: Area poverty rate was independently associated with never having been screened for breast and colorectal cancer, but not cervical cancer. The size of the variance among MMSAs was modest at best

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System · Breast cancer · Cancer · Cancer screening · Colonoscopy · Colorectal cancer · Confidence interval · Environmental health · Fecal occult blood · Logistic regression · Odds ratio · Population · Poverty · Sigmoidoscopy · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Demography · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Health disparities and outcomes · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Gerontology

  • Cancer outcomes in Hispanics/Latinos in the United States

    Betina R Yanez, Heather L Mcginty et al.•Journal of Latina/o Psychology•2016

  • A Conceptual Matrix of the Temporal and Spatial Dimensions of Socioeconomic Status and Their Relationship with Health

    Ben Lennox Kail, A Spring et al.•The Journals of Gerontology…•2018

  • Geographic variation and effect of area-level poverty rate on colorectal cancer screening

    Open Access•Min Lian, Mario Schootman et al.•BMC Public Health•2008

  • Intersectional stigma and developmental competence among youth living with HIV

    Open Access•Kemesha Gabbidon, Tiffany Chenneville et al.•Journal of Family Theory & Review•2022

  • The combined effects of activity space and neighbourhood of residence on participation in preventive health-care activities

    Open Access•Julie Vallée, Emmanuelle Cadot et al.•Health & Place•2010

  • Impact of Urban Neighborhood Disadvantage on Late Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Virginia

    Open Access•Pamela B DeGuzman, Pam Baker DeGuzman et al.•Journal of Urban Health•2017

  • Area-level Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Use of Mammography Screening

    Open Access•William A Calo, Sally W Vernon et al.•Women s Health Issues•2016

  • Community Partnerships, Food Pantries, and an Evidence‐Based Intervention to Increase Mammography Among Rural Women

    Open Access•Marcyann Bencivenga, Susan DeRubis et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2008

  • Barriers and Facilitators of Colorectal Cancer Screening for Patients of Rural Accountable Care Organization Clinics

    Open Access•Hongmei Wang, Fang Qiu et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2018

  • Condicionantes socioeconômicos e geográficos do acesso à mamografia no Brasil, 2003-2008

    Open Access•Evangelina Xavier Gouveia De Oliveira, Rômulo Sampaio Pinheiro et al.•Ciência & Saúde Coletiva•2011

  • Proactive Screening for Health Needs in United Way's 2-1-1 Information and Referral Service

    Katherine S Eddens, Matthew W Kreuter et al.•Journal of Social Service Research•2011

  • Race, neighbourhood characteristics and disparities in chemotherapy for colorectal cancer

    Yongping Hao, Hope Landrine et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2011

  • Geographic Poverty and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cervical Cancer Precursor Rates in Connecticut, 2008–2009

    Linda M Niccolai, Pamela J Julian et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2013

  • Referrals Among Cancer Services Organizations Serving Underserved Cancer Patients in an Urban Area

    Jenine K Harris, Julianne Cyr et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2011

  • Meeting the Needs of Diverse Populations

    Shobha Srinivasan, Jennifer Kerner et al.•Medical Care•2008

  • Inequities in access to mammographic screening in Brazil

    Open Access•Mário Círio Nogueira, Vívian Asssis Fayer et al.•Cadernos de Saude Publica•2019

  • Applied Logistic Regression

    David W Hosmer, Stanley Lemeshow•Applied logistic regression•2000

  • Appropriate Assessment of Neighborhood Effects on Individual Health

    Open Access•K Larsen•American Journal of Epidemiology•2005

  • The Social Environment and Health

    Irene H Yen, Leonard Syme et al.•Annual Review of Public Health•1999

  • Statistical and Substantive Inferences in Public Health

    Jeffrey B Bingenheimer, Stephen W Raudenbush•Annual Review of Public Health•2004

  • Partitioning Variation in Multilevel Models

    Harvey Goldstein, William Browne et al.•Understanding Statistics•2002

  • Area Characteristics, Individual-Level Socioeconomic Indicators, and Smoking in Young Adults

    Ana V Diez Roux•American Journal of Epidemiology•2003

  • Geocoding and Monitoring of US Socioeconomic Inequalities in Mortality and Cancer Incidence

    Nancy Krieger•American Journal of Epidemiology•2002

  • Cancer Disparities by Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status

    Open Access•Elizabeth Ward, Ahmedin Jemal et al.•CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians•2004

  • Multilevel Statistical Models

    Open Access•Harvey Goldstein•Multilevel Statistical Models•2010

  • Behavioral Health

    Open Access•David Hartley, Catherine Britain et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2002

  • Small area variations in health related behaviours; do these depend on the behaviour itself, its measurement, or on personal characteristics

    Open Access•Russell Ecob, Macintyre et al.•Health & Place•2000

  • Multilevel analytical approaches in social epidemiology

    Juan Merlo•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2003

  • Has the use of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening increased in the United States

    Laura M Anderson, Daniel May et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1995

  • Changes in the use of screening mammography

    Nancy Breen, Larry G Kessler et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1994

  • Cities and population health

    Open Access•Sandro Galea, Nicholas Freudenberg et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2005

  • Why is poverty unhealthy? Social and physical mediators

    Open Access•Deborah A Cohen, Thomas A Farley et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2003

  • Revisiting the Behavioral Model and Access to Medical Care

    Ronald Andersen, Ronald M Andersen•Journal of Health and Social…•1995

Obras citantes distintas16
Citas por año0,89
Intervalo de citas2008 - 2022 (15)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 15
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae