Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Scaling Covid-19 against inequalities

Should the policy response consistently match the mortality challenge

Bibliographic Data

ID11180467
AuthorsGerry Mccartney (0000-0001-6341-3521, Place and Wellbeing Directorate, Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK, corresponding author), Alastair H Leyland (0000-0003-3741-7099, MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit), Alastair Leyland (MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK), D Walsh (0000-0002-3390-5039, Glasgow Centre for Population Health), Ruth Dundas (0000-0002-3836-4286, MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK)
Year2021
Volume75
Issue4
Pages315-320
Publication date2021-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0143-005X • E-ISSN: 1470-2738
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/jech-2020-214373
PMID33144334
OpenAlexW3094782037
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited12

Background The mortality impact of COVID-19 has thus far been described in terms of crude death counts. We aimed to calibrate the scale of the modelled mortality impact of COVID-19 using age-standardised mortality rates and life expectancy contribution against other, socially determined, causes of death in order to inform governments and the public. Methods We compared mortality attributable to suicide, drug poisoning and socioeconomic inequality with estimates of mortality from an infectious disease model of COVID-19. We calculated age-standardised mortality rates and life expectancy contributions for the UK and its constituent nations. Results Mortality from a fully unmitigated COVID-19 pandemic is estimated to be responsible for a negative life expectancy contribution of −5.96 years for the UK. This is reduced to −0.33 years in the fully mitigated scenario. The equivalent annual life expectancy contributions of suicide, drug poisoning and socioeconomic inequality-related deaths are −0.25, −0.20 and −3.51 years, respectively. The negative impact of fully unmitigated COVID-19 on life expectancy is therefore equivalent to 24 years of suicide deaths, 30 years of drug poisoning deaths and 1.7 years of inequality-related deaths for the UK. Conclusion Fully mitigating COVID-19 is estimated to prevent a loss of 5.63 years of life expectancy for the UK. Over 10 years, there is a greater negative life expectancy contribution from inequality than around six unmitigated COVID-19 pandemics. To achieve long-term population health improvements it is therefore important to take this opportunity to introduce post-pandemic economic policies to ‘build back better’

2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Disease · Econometrics · Inequality · Mathematical analysis · Outbreak · Physics · Scaling · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) · Statistical physics · COVID-19 and healthcare impacts · Employment and Welfare Studies · Global Health Care Issues · Internal Medicine · Mathematics · Medicine · Virology

  • Impact of Covid-19 on life expectancy at birth in India

    Open Access•Suryakant Yadav, Pawan Kumar Yadav et al.•BMC Public Health•2021

  • The contribution of changes to tax and social security to stalled life expectancy trends in Scotland

    Open Access•Elizabeth Richardson, Martin Taulbut et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2021

  • National movement patterns during the Covid-19 pandemic in New Zealand

    Open Access•Malcolm Campbell, Lukáš Marek et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2021

  • Aggressive measures, rising inequalities, and mass formation during the Covid-19 crisis

    Open Access•Michaela Schippers, John P A Ioannidis et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Social Murder in the Department of Health

    Open Access•Gerry Mccartney, Wendy Hearty•Scottish Affairs•2026

  • Inequalities in population health loss by multiple deprivation

    Open Access•Grant M A Wyper, Eilidh Fletcher et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2021

  • Trends in psychological distress in Great Britain, 1991–2019

    Open Access•Anwen Zhang, Thierry Gagné et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2023

  • Is austerity a cause of slower improvements in mortality in high-income countries? A panel analysis

    Open Access•Gerry Mccartney, Robert Mcmaster et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2022

  • If the world fails to protect the economy, Covid-19 will damage health not just now but also in the future

    Open Access•Martin Mckee, David Stuckler•Nature Medicine•2020

  • Mitigating the wider health effects of covid-19 pandemic response

    Open Access•M Joanne Douglas, Margaret Douglas et al.•BMJ•2020

  • What (or who) causes health inequalities

    Gerry Mccartney, Chik Collins et al.•Health Policy•2013

  • Closing the gap in a generation

    Open Access•Michael Marmot, Sharon Friel et al.•The Lancet•2008

  • Impact of Political Economy on Population Health

    Gerry Mccartney, Wendy Hearty et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2019

  • Dying younger in Scotland

    Open Access•Lauren Schofield, D Walsh et al.•Health & Place•2016

  • Estimating the burden of the Covid-19 pandemic on mortality, life expectancy and lifespan inequality in England and Wales

    Open Access•José Manuel Aburto, Ridhi Kashyap et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2021

  • Weathering, Drugs, and Whack-a-Mole

    Open Access•A T Geronimus, John Bound et al.•Journal of Health and Social…•2019

Citations per year1.6
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae