The language myth
Why language is not an instinct
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11183354 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Arthur Holmer (Lund University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 869-871 |
| Publication date | 2016-11-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0143-4632 • E-ISSN: 1747-7557 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01434632.2016.1222715 |
| OpenAlex | W2513083084 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 3 |
No other linguistic paradigm has generated as much debate, inspiration and controversy as Chomsky’s generative model of the 1950s. Based on an assumption that the human language faculty rests upon
Cognitive science · Generative grammar · Instinct · Linguistic universal · Linguistics · Mythology · Sociology · Theoretical linguistics · Language and cultural evolution · Media, Communication, and Education · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2017 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |