Critical barriers to joint production
Datu politics and insurgent fragmentation in Southern Philippines
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11186643 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cheng Xu (0000-0001-9436-0880, Political Science, University of Toronto, Canada, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 881-897 |
| Publication date | 2020-05-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Third World Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0143-6597 • E-ISSN: 1360-2241 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01436597.2020.1723411 |
| OpenAlex | W3011043046 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 50 |
In understanding how groups overcome collective action problems of mass mobilisation in civil wars, a joint-production explanation was put forth in the civil war literature. According to this explanation, collective action can be successful when leaders at the centre tie the public good – violence towards the overall goal of the movement – inextricably to private interests of actors at the peripheral levels of the conflict. It is through this logic of joint production that we can understand the failures of the Islamic insurgencies in Southern Philippines and the spiralling levels of violence. Where other movements cohered under a common identity, the Islamist insurgency in Southern Philippines saw high degrees of fragmentation. In this paper, I argue that cleavages of regionalism created by colonial disruptions of land and social relations became a critical barrier for insurgent joint production. Furthermore, interactions between these identities and the state can pose further collective action problems. In Southern Philippines, insurgent leaders are unable to cut across these cleavages, resulting in increasingly fragmented movements and protracted conflict. Therefore, I argue that a joint-production approach to understanding civil wars can be especially promising when culturally and historically situated to explain why collective action often fails in civil war
Development economics · Economics · Fragmentation (computing · Geography · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Production (economics · Sociology · Asian Studies and History · Law · Philippine History and Culture · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Religions and Missionaries around the Pacific, 1500–1900
Islam and Peacebuilding in the Asia-Pacific
Alliance Formation in Civil Wars
Dams and Development
Raiding, Trading, and Feasting
Separatist Insurgency in the Southern Philippines
The Moro Struggle and the Challenge to Peace Building in Mindanao, Southern Philippines
Exporting Freedom
Human Security in Southeast Asia
Sultans, Shamans, and Saints
Militant Islam in Southeast Asia
Narratives and Counter-narratives
The Strategies of Terrorism
The Security Bazaar
Easy Riders, Joint Production, and Public Goods
Mindanao
Cells, Factions and Suicide Operatives
Mindanao
Spaces of Exception and Spaces of Normality
The Philippine Archipelago
Muslim Rulers and RebelsEveryday Politics and Armed Separatism in the Southern Philippines
This Land is Our Land
Bloodied Democracy
How “Free” is Free Riding in Civil Wars
The Ontology of “Political Violence
The Effect of Competition on Terrorist Group Operations
Rationalist explanations for war
Origins of the Federal Reserve System
The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement
Colonialism and change
Why Do Ethnic Groups Rebel? New Data and Analysis
Palestinian Suicide Bombing
More Combatant Groups, More Terror
Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development
Horizontal Inequalities and Ethnonationalist Civil War
Islamists and Nationalists
The Revolution Falters
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,6 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |