Crisis as Catalyst
An Inter‐Event Analysis of Social Policy Reforms in East Asia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11197546 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tao Liu (0000-0001-5480-2568, School of Public Affairs Zhejiang University Hangzhou China), Lijuan Zhao (0009-0000-0443-5392, School of Public Affairs Zhejiang University Hangzhou China, corresponding author), Xiaoqiu Meng (0009-0003-3293-5193, School of Public Affairs Zhejiang University Hangzhou China) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Policy and Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0144-5596 • E-ISSN: 1467-9515 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/spol.70030 |
| OpenAlex | W4416534020 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 34 |
This paper explores the role of crises as critical catalysts for social policy reform, with a particular focus on social welfare programs, which act as essential safeguards during periods of turmoil. Employing a historical institutionalism framework and an inter‐event qualitative case study approach, this study investigates three major crises: the 1997 Asian financial crisis, the 2008 global financial crisis, and the COVID‐19 pandemic. Through a historical lens, the study identifies a general trajectory of social policy reform in East Asian countries, moving from the novel establishment or replacement of systems, to conversion, and ultimately to layering. From a functionalist perspective, social welfare programs are reformed in response to emerging risks, highlighting the dynamic interplay between crisis‐driven pressures and institutional adaptability. The paper also underscores the diversity of policy responses across countries. As an early‐bird, Japan's reforms mainly follow policy layering, while other latecomers focus on policy establishment and conversion. Over time, as social policy and welfare systems have become more comprehensive, countries have increasingly moved toward policy layering, focusing on incremental adjustments to ensure institutional stability and adaptability
East Asia · Historical institutionalism · Institutionalism · Policy analysis · Public policy · Social policy · Social Welfare · Welfare · Asian Industrial and Economic Development · Japanese History and Culture · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Modern Mongolia
Population ageing and wellbeing
Ordering change
Comparative-historical analysis in contemporary political science
How Institutions Evolve
Structuring Politics
A defining moment? China's social policy response to the financial crisis
Social Welfare Reform Since the 1997 Economic Crisis in Korea
Social Protection in East Asia
Economic crisis and social policy reform in Korea
The coming of East and South-East Asian welfare states
Social policy reform driven by crises
The G reat R ecession and Welfare State Reform
Injured but not Entitled to Legal Insurance Compensation – Ornamental Institutions and Migrant Workers’ Informal Channels in C hina
The disembedded digital economy
Withstanding the plague
Novel welfare state responses in times of crises
The logic of deflective action
The Politics of Fiscal Responses to the Crisis of 2008–2009
The Insecure American
The Idea of Crisis in Modern Society
Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State
Institutions and Institutional Purpose
Path dependence in historical sociology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |