Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Risky by Design

The Mandatory Private Pillar of A ustralia's Retirement Income System

Bibliographic Data

ID11198539
AuthorsAllan Borowski (0000-0003-3285-8282, Department of Social Work and Social Policy La Trobe University Melbourne Australia, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume47
Issue6
Pages749-764
Publication date2013-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Policy and Administration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0144-5596 • E-ISSN: 1467-9515
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/spol.12041
OpenAlexW1561015021
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited8

A ustralia's retirement income system has been touted by some as among the world's best. Its contemporary architecture mirrors the ‘ideal’ recommended by the World Bank. Yet occupational superannuation, the mandatory private pillar of A ustralia's retirement income system, is one to which many uncertainties and, hence, risks are attached almost by design. This article explores some of these systemic risks in light of the impact of the global financial crisis ( GFC ) and its aftermath and considers some of their implications. The range of risks includes inflation risk, malfeasance and incompetence in the management of superannuation funds, exchange rate risk, investment risk, longevity risk and political risk. However, this article focuses on the latter three. While A ustralia's federal governments have become increasingly conscious of investment risk and longevity risk, greater sensitivity to political risk and its impacts is still needed

Business · Economics · Financial crisis · Financial risk · Inflation (cosmology · Investment (military · Macroeconomics · Pillar · Political risk · Political science · Politics · Risk management · Engineering · Finance · Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · State Capitalism and Financial Governance

  • Resist and Revivify

    Open Access•Jean-Paul Gagnon, Emily Beausoleil•Democratic Theory•2017

  • Don’t play if you can’t win’

    Open Access•Antonia Settle•New Political Economy•2023

  • Recent public policy and Australian older workers

    Open Access•Philip Taylor, C Earl et al.•Australian Journal of Social Issues•2016

  • The Relationship Between Political Trust and Participation in the National Pension Program

    Lu-Ming Tseng, Jui-Yun Wu•Journal of Social Service Research•2016

  • The retrenchment of public pension provision in the liberal world of welfare during the age of austerity—and its unexpected reversal, 1980–2017

    Open Access•Paul Bridgen•Social Policy and Administration•2019

  • Averting the old age crisis

    World Bank•Averting the old age crisis.•1994

  • The Political Economy of Pension Reform in Europe

    Martin Kohli, Camila Arza•Handbook of Aging and the Social…•2011

  • The Comparative Political Economy of Pension Reform

    John Myles, Paul Pierson•The New Politics of the Welfare…•2001

  • Back at the Crossroads

    Open Access•Allan Borowski•Australian Journal of Social Issues•2008

  • The certainty of uncertainty

    Allan Borowski•Health Sociology Review•2009

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2016 - 2023 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae