Exploring the age-friendliness of purpose-built retirement communities

Evidence from England

Bibliographic Data

ID11200140
AuthorsJENNIFER LIDDLE (0000-0003-1059-1230, Keele University), Thomas Scharf (0000-0003-4909-1487, National University of Ireland), Bernadette Bartlam (0000-0002-8557-6222, Keele University), Miriam Bernard (0000-0002-8255-1839, Keele University), Joe Sims (0000-0002-1816-1676, Keele University), Julius Sim
Year2014
Volume34
Issue9
Pages1601-1629
Publication date2014-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAgeing and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0144-686X • E-ISSN: 1469-1779
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0144686x13000366
OpenAlexW2000307446
LanguageEN
Citations received27
References cited21

This article contributes to emerging debates around age-friendly environments, providing empirical evidence concerning the relative age-friendliness of purpose-built retirement communities. Adopting a new definition – ‘underpinned by a commitment to respect and social inclusion, an age-friendly community is engaged in a strategic and ongoing process to facilitate active ageing by optimising the community's physical and social environments and its supporting infrastructure’ – the article analyses the age-friendliness of one retirement community in England. The Longitudinal Study of Ageing in a Retirement Community (LARC) encompassed two waves of a survey with residents, interviews and focus groups with stakeholders involved in staffing, managing and designing the community, and other qualitative data collected from residents. Reviewing the different data sources, the article argues that purpose-built retirement communities have the potential to be age-friendly settings but might better involve residents in a regular cycle of planning, implementation, evaluation and continual improvement if they are to facilitate active ageing. In addition, more clarity is needed on how such developments can better fit with the age-friendly agenda, particularly in terms of their capacity to support ageing in place, the accessibility of the wider neighbourhood, opportunities for intergenerational interactions, and the training of staff to work with older people

Active ageing · Business · CLARITY · Focus group · Inclusion (mineral) · Neighbourhood (mathematics) · Older people · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative property · Sociology · Staffing · Health disparities and outcomes · Marketing · Medicine · Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies · Nursing · Psychology · Retirement, Disability, and Employment · Social Psychology · Gerontology

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access