Partner care at the end-of-life
Identity, language and characteristics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11201201 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anne Corden (University of York, corresponding author), Michael Hirst (University of York) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 217-242 |
| Publication date | 2011-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ageing and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0144-686X • E-ISSN: 1469-1779 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0144686x10000838 |
| OpenAlex | W2124987257 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 22 |
The delivery of services and benefits to people supporting older and disabled relatives and friends depends largely on their identification within constructs of ‘care-giving’ and ‘carer’. Those who are married or living with a partner may be particularly resistant to adopting the identity of ‘care-giver’ or ‘care receiver’. This paper investigates the circumstances of couples and their adoption of carer identities, drawing on a study of the financial implications of a partner's death. That study was based on over 750 couples where one partner died, drawn from the British Household Panel Survey, and separate qualitative interviews with people whose partner died in the previous two years. The findings show that carer self-identification was influenced by the partner's health-care needs and service contacts, including welfare benefits receipts. None of the socio-demographic factors considered was statistically linked to whether people described themselves as providing care for their partner, unless there was an underlying association with the partner's health-care needs. The findings underline the problems of using self-reported identities in surveys and estimates of take-up of services and benefits, and the difficulties of delivering entitlements to people who care for their partner at the end-of-life. A challenge for policy makers is how to move beyond formal categories of ‘carer’ and ‘care-giving’ to incorporate inter-dependence, emotional commitment and the language of relationships in planning support for frail older people
Business · Health care · Identification (biology) · Identity (music) · Political science · Qualitative research · Service (business) · Sociology · Welfare · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Health disparities and outcomes · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Marketing · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology
Factors associated with the identification and well-being of hidden and confirmed carers
Employment Responses to a Partner’s Disability Onset (“Care Shocks”)
Problematising carer identification
The Moral Resilience of Young People Who Care
Older Carers and Carers of People with Dementia
The Experiences of Older Unpaid Carers in New Zealand
Exploring identity in the ‘figured worlds’ of cancer care-giving and marriage in Australia
When is a carer’s employment at risk? Longitudinal analysis of unpaid care and employment in midlife in England
Spousal care-giving arrangements in Europe. The role of gender, socio-economic status and the welfare state
A critical evaluation of research associated with carers’ organisations since the start of the Carers' Movement
The extent and predictors of discrepancy between provider and recipient reports of informal caregiving
Attachment, caregiving, and relationship functioning in couples
Death, dying and social differences
Property Regimes for Home‐sharers
Aging and decision‐making competence
Self-identifying as a caregiver
Relationship-based social policy
Call us carers
Relying on informal care in the new century? Informal care for elderly people in England to 2031
The Meaning of Informal Care
Mortality and morality
The impact of the marital relationship on the experience of caring for an elderly spouse with dementia
Just live for today’. Living, caring, ageing and dying
Challenging Professional Roles
Race and community care
The gaze and visibility of the carer
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,85 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2026 (14) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |