Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What Did Chartism Petition For? Mass Petitions in the British Movement for Democracy

Bibliographic Data

ID11204804
AuthorsMalcolm Chase (corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume43
Issue3
Pages531-551
Publication date2019-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0145-5532 • E-ISSN: 1527-8034
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/ssh.2019.20
OpenAlexW2804353449
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited21

Chartism was in effect Britain’s civil rights movement and petitioning was at its heart: it defined who the Chartists were as well as the “other” against which they were implacably opposed. Its history has been effectively narrated around its three national petitions (1839, 1842, and 1848), and its decline almost habitually and directly linked to circumstances surrounding the last of these. More than 3.3 million people signed the 1842 National Petition. Chartism’s history after 1842 is partly one of how the State learned to manage the movement in general and petitioning in particular. The question posed by the title is deliberately ambiguous: What did the Chartists petition for and, equally, why did they bother? The first issue will be answered by a close reading of the three texts (surprisingly not undertaken by previous historians of the movement). The second will answered through an analysis of the wider uses of petitioning. The third issue addressed by this article is how petitioning constructed Chartism. In every contributing locality, canvassing was a major intervention in political life. The subscriptional community created by its petitions were “the people,” a term that clearly included not only men but also women and children. This was a different and wider meaning of the term “the people” from that used by Chartism’s opponents and it was a profound departure. Petitioning shaped, articulated, and mobilized the politics of a nascent working class, “banded together in one solemn and holy league” but excluded from economic and political power

Democracy · League · Meaning (existential · Movement (music · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · State (computer science · European Political History Analysis · History · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Psychology · Scottish History and National Identity

  • Las peticiones de maestras y maestros en la construcción de leyes jubilatorias. Buenos Aires, 1870-1886

    Open Access•Paula Erijman•Revista Historia y Justicia•2025

  • Chartism

    Open Access•Matthew Roberts•Revue française de civilisation…•2025

  • These oppressions won’t cease

    Open Access•Johan Fourie•New Contree•2020

  • Firmas del conservadurismo

    Open Access•H Miller•Historia y Política Ideas…•2021

  • Petitioners and Rebels

    Open Access•Robert Poole, Robert W Poole•Social Science History•2019

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Henry Miller•Social Science History•2019

  • The Contested Right of Public Meeting in England from the Bill of Rights to the Public Order Acts

    Open Access•Katrina Navickas•Transactions of the Royal…•2022

  • Radical expression

    James Epstein•Radical expression•1994

  • The class struggle and the industrial revolution

    Stephen Clarkson•Soviet Theory of Development•1978

  • Languages of Class

    Open Access•Gareth Stedman Jones•Languages of Class•1984

  • The Early Chartists

    Open Access•Dorothy Thompson•The Early Chartists•1971

  • A Chartist Singularity? Mobilizing to Promote Democratic Petitions in Britain and France, 1838-1848

    Benoît Agnès•Labour History Review•2013

  • The Public's Reaction to Public Health

    Jill Hanley, J G Hanley•Social History of Medicine•2002

  • The Gordon Riots

    John Bohstedt•Social History•2013

  • Petitioners and Rebels

    Open Access•Robert Poole, Robert W Poole•Social Science History•2019

  • And Your Petitioners &c

    P A Pickering•The English Historical Review•2001

  • An Overpowering “Itch for Writing”’

    Open Access•Malcolm Chase•The English Historical Review•2018

  • Popular Petitioning and the Corn Laws, 1833–46

    Open Access•Henry Miller•The English Historical Review•2012

  • Women Against Slavery

    Clare Midgley•Women Against Slavery•2004

  • Robert Lowery

    F K Donnelly, Beverly Harrison et al.•Labour / Le Travail•1983

  • Chartism from above

    Open Access•R A Saunders, Robert Saunders•Historical Research•2008

  • Outsiders

    Steve Poole•Women s History Review•1996

  • Robert Lowery

    D J Rowe, Beverly Harrison et al.•The Economic History Review•1980

Unique citing works7
Citations per year1
Citation span2019 - 2025 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae