Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Final Data and Summary Comments

Bibliographic Data

ID11205428
AuthorsN’omi B Greber (Cleveland Museum of Natural History, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume34
Issue1
Pages171-186
Publication date2009-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMidcontinental Journal of Archaeology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0146-1109 • E-ISSN: 2327-4271
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1179/mca.2009.011
OpenAlexW2039176949
LanguageEN
Citations received4

Comments on the distribution of mica recovered by the Ohio Historical Society 1971–1977 excavations of seven wooden structures introduce the summary comments. The interpretation of these seven structures as craft houses has been engrained into the “common wisdom” of North American archaeology for a generation. We have re-studied the artifacts and extant records and concluded that the data does not support this interpretation. The original analysis by the excavators treated the materials in the mound that had been placed over a decommissioned structure as directly associated with the activities that took place within that structure. Our review of the records and the physical materials recovered shows that such an assumption is not consistent with the data. These structures and their immediate environs were clearly special places, as seen by the care taken to dismantle each structure then deliberately cover the remains. It is easy to point out evidence for a variety of ritual/ceremonial activities associated with the big houses at Seip. Yet, this locality is more a place of rituals that saw repeated visits over generations that resulted in patterned constructions on the same relatively small piece of land. Data from later excavations at Seip by the Cleveland Museum of Natural History and Arizona State University fit his interpretation. Data from recent excavations at the Stubbs Earthworks and Fort Ancient Earthworks in the Little Miami Valley record construction histories of wooden structures at these sites that differ from the treatment seen at Seip. These differences illustrate the unique nature of this small area not only at Seip but also within what is currently known about Ohio Hopewell

Archaeological record · Archaeology · Civil engineering · Craft · Excavation · Excavator · Extant taxon · Geography · Interpretation (philosophy · Variety (cybernetics · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies · Computer Science · Engineering · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies · History

  • Placing the dead on the Green River

    R Berle Clay•Southeastern Archaeology•2022

  • Ritual Economy and the Organization of Scioto Hopewell Craft Production

    Open Access•Timothy D Everhart, Bret J Ruby•American Antiquity•2020

  • Ritualised craft production at the Hopewell periphery

    Open Access•Alice P Wright, Erika Loveland et al.•Antiquity•2015

  • Ritual economy and craft production in small-scale societies

    Open Access•G Logan Miller•Journal of Anthropological…•2015

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,36
Citation span2015 - 2022 (8)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae