Between a Rock and a Hard Place

How Kazakhstan's Civil Society Navigates Precarity

Bibliographic Data

ID11211999
AuthorsCorinne Wood (0000-0002-7158-9647, Century College, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume103
Pages44-61
Publication date2023-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Labor and Working-Class History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0147-5479 • E-ISSN: 1471-6445
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0147547923000157
OpenAlexW4386164373
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited11

What forms of precarity do civil society actors experience in Central Asia? What are the sources of these precarities? In this article, I synthesize literature from political science and development studies to identify five top-down mechanisms of precaritization for civil society: (extra)legal restrictions on operations, financing activities, flows of funding from the Global North, professionalization, and the sociopolitical atmosphere. I draw on twenty-seven interviews with activists and human rights defenders in Kazakhstan to consider how civil society actors navigate structural constraints on their work. In line with the literature on authoritarian regimes, I find that civil society actors who criticize the regime face precarity through coercion and bureaucratic demands. But whereas development studies scholarship has been pessimistic about the effects of professionalization, Kazakhstan's civil society actors see their technical training and pressure to formalize their organizations as beneficial to their reputation and institutional leverage

Authoritarianism · Bureaucracy · Civil society · Democracy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Precarity · Professionalization · Scholarship · Sociology · Employment and Welfare Studies · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access