Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Meta-Analysis as a Research Synthesis Methodology

Cause for Concern

Bibliographic Data

ID11214466
AuthorsWilliam R Nugent (0000-0003-0811-3221, University of Tennessee at Knoxville, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume35
Issue2
Pages181-192
Publication date2009-03-04
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Social Service Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0148-8376 • E-ISSN: 1540-7314
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01488370802678967
OpenAlexW2043403044
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited9

The use of meta-analysis is growing in popularity. It is based on the fundamental notion of the effect size, and a critical assumption is that effect sizes based on different measures are directly comparable. In this article it is argued that the direct comparability of effect sizes across measures implies the invariance of the effect sizes across these measures. A model of standardized mean difference (SMD) effect size invariance is developed, based on multifacet generalizability theory, which shows that SMD effect size invariance requires certain validity invariance conditions to hold. One implication of these findings is that the direct comparability of SMD effect sizes based on different measurement procedures is an empirical matter requiring testing prior to conducting a meta-analysis. Findings are also discussed suggesting that violations of one of these conditions—universe score validity invariance—can bring about substantial differences across SMD effect sizes as a function of measurement procedure. These findings suggest the need for a more refined use of meta-analysis since meta-analytic results may be adversely impacted by the lack of direct comparability of effect sizes based on different measures

Comparability · Confirmatory factor analysis · Econometrics · Generalizability theory · Measurement invariance · Meta-analysis · Popularity · Sample size determination · Statistics · Strictly standardized mean difference · Structural equation modeling · Mathematics · Medicine · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • The (Non)Comparability of the Correlation Effect Size Across Different Measurement Procedures

    William R Nugent•Journal of Evidence-Based Social…•2011

  • Promoting a practice-minded culture in research organizations

    Jan Steyaert, F C P P Spierings et al.•European Journal of Social Work•2011

  • The Social Work Practice Research Conundrum

    John S Wodarski•Journal of Human Behavior in the…•2011

  • Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores

    Frederic M Lord, Melvin R Novick•Statistical Theories of Mental…•2008

  • Generalizability Theory

    Open Access•Robert L Brennan•Generalizability Theory•2001

  • Construct Validity Invariance and Discrepancies in Meta-Analytic Effect Sizes Based on Different Measures

    Open Access•William R Nugent•Educational and Psychological…•2009

  • The Comparability of the Standardized Mean Difference Effect Size Across Different Measures of the Same Construct

    Open Access•William R Nugent•Educational and Psychological…•2006

  • The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment

    Mark W Lipsey, Darryl Babe Wilson et al.•American Psychologist•1993

Citations per year0.2
Citation span2011 - 2011 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae