China's Pro-Poor Growth
Measurement and Implications
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11215527 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Xiaolin Wang (0000-0001-7237-5969, Moscow State University of Technologies and Management named after K.G. Razumovskiy, corresponding author), Liping Xu (0000-0002-6901-5214), XU Li-ping (0000-0003-4079-8451), Xiaoyuan Shang (0000-0002-5074-9971) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 520-529 |
| Publication date | 2014-08-08 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Social Service Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0148-8376 • E-ISSN: 1540-7314 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01488376.2014.922523 |
| OpenAlex | W2067876659 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 6 |
Pro-poor growth has been the preeminent strategic framework of the international development community because it describes relationships between growth, inequality, and poverty. Assessing whether economic growth and income distributional changes are “pro-poor” has important policy implications and has become increasingly widespread in academic and policy societies. The article aims to measure the pro-poor growth in rural China from 1989 to 2009 through analyzing the household survey data collected by the China Health and Nutrition Survey. Among the main findings, from 1989 to 2006, China's economic growth in rural areas was relatively weakly pro-poor and poverty reduction mainly relied on the “trickle-down effect” of economic growth. However, since 2006, both the “trickle-down effect” of growth and changes in income distribution have reduced poverty. During this period, Chinese economic growth was pro-poor. Research on pro-poor growth based on more comprehensive data is urgently needed to advise policymakers to make relevant policies
China · Development economics · Distribution (mathematics · Economic growth · Economics · Income distribution · Inequality · Political science · Poverty · Poverty reduction · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare · Social and Economic Development in India
| Citations per year | 0.8 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |