A tale of two red lines
Managing foreign policy crises in the Obama and Trump administrations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11221486 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luís Miguel Da Vinha (0000-0002-7222-5095, Flinders University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 63-85 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Strategy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0149-5933 • E-ISSN: 1521-0448 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01495933.2021.1853441 |
| OpenAlex | W3124789945 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
International crises emphasize the critical role that presidents and their advisory systems play in formulating and implementing foreign policy. Scholarly research has identified three distinct conceptual models of how presidents manage their decision-making systems – the competitive, formalistic, and collegial models. This article examines how Presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump managed their advisory systems and formulated their policies toward Syria after the Assad regime employed chemical weapons against its people. The case studies demonstrate that each president employed a different approach to the decision-making processes, which significantly influenced the U.S. response to Syria’s use of chemical weapons
Chemical warfare · Foreign policy · International relations · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |