Public policy and nuclear disarmament
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11221639 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christopher Stevens (0000-0003-3178-3290, Misericordia University, corresponding author), Christopher A Stevens (Misericordia University) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 191-206 |
| Publication date | 2018-05-27 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Strategy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0149-5933 • E-ISSN: 1521-0448 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01495933.2018.1486084 |
| OpenAlex | W2902411781 |
| Language | EN |
Only Belarus, Kazakhstan, South Africa, and Ukraine have completely surrendered nuclear weapons and then signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Although a declining security threat marks the decision-making process in all four countries, it is not clear advocates of disarmament understand the factors that caused the perception of a more cooperative security environment, and whether the lessons from those cases are applicable to the non-NPT nuclear weapons states. The literature lacks an analysis of the lessons learned from previous disarmament cases, but this study argues that the analysis cannot provide actionable, policy-relevant knowledge to further the cause of global disarmament
Business · Disarmament · International trade · Nuclear ethics · Nuclear weapon · Political science · Treaty · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense · Public Administration
| Highly cited | No |
|---|