Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Indian and Pakistani views on nuclear deterrence

Bibliographic Data

ID11221740
AuthorsGregory F Giles (Science Applications International Corporation (United States), corresponding author), James E Doyle (Science Applications International Corporation (United States))
Year1996
Volume15
Issue2
Pages135-159
Publication date1996-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueComparative Strategy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0149-5933 • E-ISSN: 1521-0448
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01495939608403064
OpenAlexW2084604015
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited2

While officials in India and Pakistan have been virtually silent on the issue of nuclear deterrence in South Asia, a small number of nonofficial strategists in both countries are moving to fill the void. They describe the current low‐level nuclear standoff as “recessed deterrence.” Nuclear weapons advocates within this group have voiced their dissatisfaction with the status quo, ostensibly because nuclear ambiguity undermines stability. This has led them to promote the concept of “minimum deterrence,” described essentially as a scaled‐down version of the superpower assured destruction doctrine. Generally, strategists that favor nuclear deployment have high confidence that India and Pakistan would be responsible nuclear powers. They also contend that just as nuclear deterrence stabilized U.S.‐Soviet relations, so too can it work for South Asia. Other analysts are more skeptical, both of the premise behind minimum deterrence and the observance of nuclear restraint in the subcontinent. They likewise question the applicability of the superpower model of deterrence for India and Pakistan

China · Deterrence theory · Doctrine · Economics · International trade · Law and economics · Nuclear ethics · Nuclear weapon · Political economy · Political science · Premise · Superpower · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense · Philosophy

  • Command and control challenges in South Asia

    Clayton P Bowen, Daniel Wolvén•The Nonproliferation Review•1999

  • Pakistani Nuclear Doctrine and The Dangers of Strategic Myopia

    Timothy D Hoyt•Asian Survey•2001

  • Nuclear weapons in South Asia

    John Arquilla•Comparative Strategy•1997

  • Nuclear Weapons and Indian Strategic Culture

    Open Access•Rajesh M Basrur, Rajesh Basrur•Journal of Peace Research•2001

  • Old quarrels and new realities

    Rodney W Jones•The Washington Quarterly•1992

  • A Nuclear Third Way in South Asia

    George Perkovich•Foreign Policy•1993

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,14
Citation span1997 - 2001 (5)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae