Decision-making style and victory in battle—Is there a relation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11221948 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lars Henåker (0000-0001-5206-9745, Swedish Defence University, Stockholm, Sweden, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 415-436 |
| Publication date | 2022-07-04 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Strategy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0149-5933 • E-ISSN: 1521-0448 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01495933.2022.2087436 |
| OpenAlex | W4286634534 |
| Language | EN |
Can decision-making styles impact victory and defeat in armed conflicts? To answer the question of whether decision-making styles are linked to the victories and defeats of individual tacticians, this study utilizes five general decision-making styles: Rational, Intuitive, Dependent, Avoidant and Spontaneous. The aim of this study is to examine whether one or several of the general decision-making styles (GDMS) have an impact on tactical outcomes in wargames. A total of 104 officers and academics participated in the study. The study's foremost conclusion is that the Dependent style is significantly connected to defeat in the wargame's dueling set up
Battle · Operations research · Political science · Relation (database · Set (abstract data type · Style (visual arts · Victory · Computer Science · Engineering · History · Law · Military History and Strategy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|