Winning the Gray Zone
The importance of intermediate force capabilities in implementing the National Defense Strategy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11222149 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jr Wendell B Leimbach (Joint Intermediate Force Capabilities Office, Marine Corps Base Quantico, The Pentagon, Washington, DC, USA), Wendell B Leimbach, Susan D Levine (Joint Intermediate Force Capabilities Office, Marine Corps Base Quantico, The Pentagon, Washington, DC, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 223-234 |
| Publication date | 2021-05-04 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Strategy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0149-5933 • E-ISSN: 1521-0448 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01495933.2021.1912490 |
| OpenAlex | W3172493888 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
While the United States must always be ready to prevail during a high-end conflict --and overwhelming lethality represents a significant deterrent to conflict in the first place --the Nation must also be able to overwhelmingly compete and deter activity short of traditional armed conflict. In the language of emerging Joint Doctrine, this is known as the “Competition Below Armed Conflict” portion of the “Competition Continuum.” It is also referred to as the Gray Zone, Hybrid Warfare or Irregular Warfare. Winning in the Gray Zone means completing the “deterrence equation,” that is, precluding adversary aggression in competition below armed conflict with intermediate force capabilities (IFCs) in a manner similar to equipping the U.S. military element of national power with overwhelming lethality as a deterrent to armed conflict. IFCs, which include non-lethal weapons as well as other non-lethal tools, will bridge the gap that exists between a mission of mere presence and the use of lethal effects. These capabilities allow active measures when presence alone is insufficient to deter malign activities or when the use of lethal or destructive force is neither desired nor appropriate. The addition of IFCs to the Joint Force’s toolkit will help the Services maintain a decisive advantage over strategic competitors, in addition to the lethal force that is the hallmark of the U.S. military
Adversary · Competition (biology · Competitor analysis · Computer security · Deterrence theory · Doctrine · Economics · Gray (unit · Law and economics · Lethality · Management · National security · Nuclear weapon · Political science · Computer Science · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · Law · Medicine · Military and Defense Studies · Military History and Strategy
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2024 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |