Quel statut pour l'expert
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11225779 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rafael Encinas De Munagorri (0000-0001-6965-8116, Droit et changement social, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 103 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 379 |
| Publication date | 2002-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revue française d administration publique (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0152-7401 • E-ISSN: 1965-0620 |
| Publisher | CAIRN (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3917/rfap.103.0379 |
| OpenAlex | W1995340417 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
In the French administration, unlike its parallel in America, expertise exists in a culture where decision-making is centralized, confidential, and non-negotiated. This is evidenced in the status of the expert, who is both dependent on the administration and independent in carrying out his mission. Nonetheless, establishing a legal status for the expert would make it possible to define with greater precision his rights and obligations, his role in decision-making and above all his responsibilities, with a clear distinction between his and those of the administration
Administration (probate law · Business · Confidentiality · Law and economics · Legal status · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Health, Medicine and Society · Healthcare Systems and Practices · Law · Social Sciences and Governance
Aux frontières de l'expertise
Quality of post-sentence psychiatric expert reports on individuals convicted of islamist terrorist offenses
Transmettre et légitimer
L’expertise au prisme du contrôle du juge
Les évolutions de la reconnaissance des (in)capacités juridiques
Des sciences par et pour le gouvernement
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,38 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2026 (17) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |