La réforme de la gestion publique change-t-elle les systèmes administratifs
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11226206 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Geert Bouckaert (0000-0002-0282-8106, Institut Scientifique de Santé Publique, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 105-106 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 39-54 |
| Publication date | 2003-03-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revue française d administration publique (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0152-7401 • E-ISSN: 1965-0620 |
| Publisher | CAIRN.INFO (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3917/rfap.105.0039 |
| OpenAlex | W2052189839 |
| Language | FR |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 1 |
Whether and in what ways public management reform changes administrative systems are questions that can only be raised in cases of truly substantial reform policies which bring about changes in standards and habits, and as a consequence, in the administrative system itself. Three distinct hypotheses explain the transformation of administrative systems : changing public management tools pressures ; restructuring. Four main patterns of strategies are observable : “maintain”, “modernizing”, “marketising”, “minimising”. As a hypothesis on the change of administration systems, one could say that the Weberian State has shifted to the Neo-Weberian State under influence of a “maintain/modernise” based public management reform trajectory
Algorithm · Political science · Public management · Restructuring · State (computer science · Computer Science · French Urban and Social Studies · Healthcare Systems and Practices · Law · Public Administration · Social Sciences and Governance
| Citations per year | 0.21 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2007 - 2019 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |