Rural Disadvantage in the Distribution of South Australian Home and Community Care Funding
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11228581 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James G Barber (0009-0008-7699-4650, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 231-239 |
| Publication date | 1998-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0157-6321 • E-ISSN: 1839-4655 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/j.1839-4655.1998.tb01332.x |
| OpenAlex | W2329417824 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
In this paper, the level of HACC funding under the South Australian Dementia Support and Respite Projects and the Community Support Scheme was compared across Domiciliary Care and Human Services and Health regions. Results revealed that metropolitan regions generally received more than their per capita share of HACC funding despite the greater cost of community services in rural areas and the relative paucity of supplementary or alternative rural services. The need for greater planning in the distribution of HACC funds, including moving towards formula funding is identified
Aged care · Business · Disadvantage · Distribution (mathematics · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Geography · Health care · Health economics · Metropolitan area · Per capita · Political science · Population · Project commissioning · Publishing · Respite care · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Medicine · Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies · Nursing · Rural development and sustainability
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |