Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Are medicare and pharmaceutical benefit scheme services too costly for patients? An epilepsy‐based study

Bibliographic Data

ID11228750
AuthorsChris L Peterson (0000-0002-1168-6058, College of Arts, Social Sciences and Commerce La Trobe University Melbourne Vic. Australia, corresponding author), Christine Walker (0000-0003-3505-9742, Epilepsy Foundation Surrey Hills Vic. Australia)
Year2018
Volume53
Issue4
Pages386-399
Publication date2018-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0157-6321 • E-ISSN: 1839-4655
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ajs4.57
OpenAlexW2906358745
LanguageEN
References cited26

Based on evidence of the relationship between socioeconomic inequality and inequalities in health, this study provides an example of how inequality is experienced by a group of people with epilepsy and the impacts of out‐of‐pocket costs ( OOP s) on their access to essential healthcare. This study examines healthcare inequity based on socioeconomic disadvantage, demonstrated through a sample of people with epilepsy with OOP for Medical Benefits Scheme ( MBS ) services and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme ( PBS ) medicines. Wave 3 of the Australian Epilepsy Longitudinal Study was conducted with a community sample of 324 people with epilepsy. Medical Benefits Scheme and PBS data were collected for 17 per cent of the sample. Level of MBS and PBS OOP s, proportion of household weekly income and the effects of age, gender and location were analysed. MBS OOP expenses were generally higher than PBS . The proportion of weekly household income for the lowest income group was highest for both MBS and PBS OOP s. Women paid nearly twice the amount of MBS OOP than men. Those over 65 years paid far more for MBS and PBS OOP s than younger people. Rural people paid a significantly lower proportion for MBS than people from the city. In‐depth analysis of 11 people showed that many struggle financially

Business · Disadvantage · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Epilepsy · Health care · Inequality · Low income · Medical prescription · Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme · Population · Psychiatry · Sample (material · Socioeconomic status · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Computer Science · Global Maternal and Child Health · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Policy and Management · Mathematics · Medicine · Nursing · Gerontology

  • Socioeconomic Position

    John Lynch, George A Kaplan et al.•Social epidemiology•2000

  • Social determinants of health inequalities

    Open Access•Michael Marmot•The Lancet•2005

  • Equity in prevention and health care

    Vincent Lorant, B Boland et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2002

  • The persistence of health inequalities in modern welfare states

    Open Access•J P Mackenbach•Social Science & Medicine•2012

  • Socioeconomic equity in amenable mortality in Finland 1992-2008

    Open Access•Sonja Lumme, Reijo Sund et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2012

  • The measurement of SES in health research

    Open Access•J Michael Oakes, Peter H Rossi•Social Science & Medicine•2003

  • Educational inequalities in avoidable deaths in Norway

    Espen Dahl, Dag Hofo et al.•Health Sociology Review•2007

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae