Non‐genetic Mothers and Their ‘Own’ Children
Infertility and IVF Donor Birth
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11228952 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Erica Hallebone (The Royal Melbourne Hospital, corresponding author), Erica L Hallebone |
| Year | 1991 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 122-136 |
| Publication date | 1991-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0157-6321 • E-ISSN: 1839-4655 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/j.1839-4655.1991.tb01229.x |
| PMID | 16130265 |
| OpenAlex | W2396562784 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
Over the 1980s in Western societies which have used new reproductive technologies, there has been intense argumentation about connected philosophical, ethical and economic issues. This research on I.V.F. donor egg (i.e. ‘non‐genetic’) motherhood is based on qualitative data from partial life histories of twelve women having children by this technology through a Melbourne infertility programme. Methodology, interpretation and discussion place it within both critical social and feminist personal identity theoretical frameworks. None of the respondent women but all except one of their respective partners are the biological parents of a total of ten children already born at the data collection stage, and in three well‐established pregnancies. Two‐thirds of the respondents used ‘unknown’ donor ova. ‘Known’ donors were typically the recipients' sisters. Many of these Australian births represent world ‘firsts’ in medical technical applications. In biographical accounts, the focus was on experiences of social pressure towards parenthood, of infertility and medical treatment, and attitudes of openness or secrecy about using donated ova. While socially and technologically acquired parenthood added a highly‐desired dimension to their social identities, a sense of loss appeared to persist in most of the women's personal identities. Where a policy of secrecy towards relatives and friends about use of reproductive technology and gamete donation was maintained, this loss was reinforced by a feeling of social isolation
Assisted reproductive technology · Biology · Developmental psychology · Egg donation · Feeling · Focus group · Gynecology · Infertility · Political science · Pregnancy · Qualitative research · Reproductive technology · Respondent · Secrecy · Social science · Sociology · Sperm donation · Gender Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|