Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Paternalism in Australian Courts

Bibliographic Data

ID11229322
AuthorsG J Syme, Geoff Syme (corresponding author)
Year1976
Volume11
Issue4
Pages287-290
Publication date1976-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0157-6321 • E-ISSN: 1839-4655
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/j.1839-4655.1976.tb00580.x
OpenAlexW2529982557
LanguageEN
References cited2

Female defendants were found to be treated more leniently than male defendants in a simulated jury experiment. The possibility of favouritism towards females in Australian courts should be further examined

Paternalism · Political science · Project commissioning · Publishing · Sociology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems

  • The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules

    Janet Haggerty Davis, James H Davis et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1975

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae