Public Consultation and Juvenile Justice Reform
A Queensland Case Study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11229359 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard Hil (corresponding author), Leanne Roughley |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 21-36 |
| Publication date | 1997-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0157-6321 • E-ISSN: 1839-4655 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/j.1839-4655.1997.tb01290.x |
| OpenAlex | W2225603500 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
The paper examines critically the relationship between the rhetoric and reality of the then Queensland Government's consultation procedures in relation to the 1992 Juvenile Justice Bill. It is argued that although the State Government viewed consultation as central to the process of social policy reform, the steps adopted to achieve this in the case of the Juvenile Justice Bill were regarded widely as inadequate in a number of important respects. We contend that such shortcomings were generated by a number of interconnected factors, not least being the Queensland Government's hasty attempt to appease public concern over juvenile crime, and the absence of a practise model to implement it's stated aims of public consultation. This in turn served to enhance the political legitimacy of the Labor Government in the period prior to its re‐election in September 1992
Criminology · Economic Justice · Government (linguistics · Juvenile · Legitimacy · Political science · Politics · Project commissioning · Publishing · Rhetoric · Sociology · State (computer science · Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism · Law · Public Administration
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |