Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Fallacy of a One Size Fits All Cannabis Policy

Bibliographic Data

ID11229522
AuthorsAmanda Reiman (0000-0001-9958-2597, Drug Policy Alliance, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume1
Issue35
Pages104-122
Publication date2022-11-21
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumboldt Journal of Social Relations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0160-4341 • E-ISSN: 0160-4341
PublisherThe Press at Cal Poly Humboldt (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.55671/0160-4341.1190
OpenAlexW4309711248
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited8

Although the cannabis plant is one of the oldest herbal products currently in use, the policies and research surrounding its use and associated risks and benefits have been points of contention throughout its modern lifespan. Cannabis has been seen as a revered botanical medicine, a demon substance sure to ruin modern society, and an alternative to Western-born pharmaceutical drugs and treatments. Over time, the debate concerning cannabis has been driven by morality, science, politics, economics and social control. Given its multiple uses (textiles, medicine, and relaxation), developing one policy to encompass these uses in a responsible way remains elusive. This paper seeks to explain why a “one size fits all” regulatory framework is not sufficient for cannabis. Antiquated notions of the effectiveness of botanical medicines compared with pharmaceutical drugs and the difference between curative (curing a diseased state) and palliative (addressing the symptoms associated with a diseased state) treatments have muddied the cannabis policy waters. Efforts to regulate the raw plant alongside cannabinoid-based medications have resulted in a regulatory roadblock, often framing doctors as gatekeepers. I propose that in order to move past this roadblock and to maximize the benefits of the cannabis plant for both curative and palliative treatments of conditions such as substance dependence, the plant and the cannabinoid-based medications must part ways and seek their own, individual regulatory destiny

Cannabis · Economics · Fallacy · Political science · Politics · Psychiatry · Public economics · Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research · Law · Medicine · Psychedelics and Drug Studies

  • El problema mundial de las drogas

    Open Access•Jorge Contreras Peralta, Pedro Manuel Rodríguez Suarez•TLA-MELAUA•2020

  • The trajectory of “medical cannabis” in Israel

    Open Access•Dana Zarhin•International Journal of Drug…•2020

  • Agendas, alternatives, and public policies

    John W Kingdon•Agendas, alternatives, and public…•1995

  • The Forbidden Fruit and the Tree of Knowledge

    Open Access•Richard J Bonnie, Charles H Whitebread et al.•Virginia Law Review•1970

  • Marijuana

    George Fisher•Beware Euphoria•2024

  • Marihuana

    J Rosslyn Earp•American Journal of Public Health…•1939

  • Therapeutic Use of Cannabis by Crack Addicts in Brazil

    Eliseu Labigalini, Lucio Ribeiro Rodrigues et al.•Journal of Psychoactive Drugs•1999

  • The Struggle of Mankind Against its Deadliest Foe

    Susan L Speaker•Journal of Social History•2001

  • The Legislation of Morality

    Robert H Vasoli, Troy Duster•American Sociological Review•1971

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2020 - 2020 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae