Illuminative Evaluation
Meeting the Special Needs of Feminist Projects
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11230278 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joan Poliner Shapiro (0000-0001-7016-4113, University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author), Beth Glover Reed (Feminist Press), Beth Reed (Feminist Press) |
| Year | 1984 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 432-441 |
| Publication date | 1984-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Humanity & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0160-5976 • E-ISSN: 2372-9708 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/016059768400800407 |
| OpenAlex | W107715040 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
Illuminative evaluation, as defined by , Parlett and Hamilton, is not a standard methodological package but a general strategy. It aims to be both adaptable and eclectic. The choice'of res ctics follows not from research doetrine, but from decisions in each case as to the best availible techniques; the problem defines the methodsnot vice-versa., An illuminative evaluation technique was ushWto assess the strengths and-weaknesses, and to assist the planners in their understanding of the dynamics and the shapliof the First National Summer Institute in Women's Studies. Quantifiable information was obtained through a needs' assessment form, administered to participants (nm48) and staff (n1.13), through observations of the formal and informal sessons and staff meetings, and through open-ended questions on an evaluation.form. The findings indicate that illuminative evaluation showed promise as one evaluative methodology compatible with feminist activity and theoretical concerns. This model enabled a report to be developed which would serve jto. offer both qualitative and quantitative data useful to the designing of the Institute, provide information for continued funding of the project, and include documentation of the first year of the Institute. (Author/PN)
Engineering ethics · Sociology · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Gender Studies
| Citations per year | 0.03 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1989 - 1989 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |