Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Illuminative Evaluation

Meeting the Special Needs of Feminist Projects

Bibliographic Data

ID11230278
AuthorsJoan Poliner Shapiro (0000-0001-7016-4113, University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author), Beth Glover Reed (Feminist Press), Beth Reed (Feminist Press)
Year1984
Volume8
Issue4
Pages432-441
Publication date1984-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanity & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0160-5976 • E-ISSN: 2372-9708
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/016059768400800407
OpenAlexW107715040
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited3

Illuminative evaluation, as defined by , Parlett and Hamilton, is not a standard methodological package but a general strategy. It aims to be both adaptable and eclectic. The choice'of res ctics follows not from research doetrine, but from decisions in each case as to the best availible techniques; the problem defines the methodsnot vice-versa., An illuminative evaluation technique was ushWto assess the strengths and-weaknesses, and to assist the planners in their understanding of the dynamics and the shapliof the First National Summer Institute in Women's Studies. Quantifiable information was obtained through a needs' assessment form, administered to participants (nm48) and staff (n1.13), through observations of the formal and informal sessons and staff meetings, and through open-ended questions on an evaluation.form. The findings indicate that illuminative evaluation showed promise as one evaluative methodology compatible with feminist activity and theoretical concerns. This model enabled a report to be developed which would serve jto. offer both qualitative and quantitative data useful to the designing of the Institute, provide information for continued funding of the project, and include documentation of the first year of the Institute. (Author/PN)

Engineering ethics · Sociology · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Gender Studies

  • The “other voices” in contemporary ethical dilemmas

    Open Access•Joan Poliner Shapiro, Carroll Smith-Rosenberg•Women s Studies International Forum•1989

  • The double standard

    Margrit Eichler•The double standard•1979

  • Feminist Criticism of the Social Sciences

    Marcia Westkott•Harvard Educational Review•1979

  • Theories of Women's Studies

    Gloria Bowles, Renate Duelli Klein•Theories of Women's Studies•2024

Citations per year0.03
Citation span1989 - 1989 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae