Upholding the green agenda of COP27 through publicly funded R&D on energy efficiencies, renewables, nuclear and power storage technologies

Bibliographic Data

ID11237837
AuthorsEmmanuel Uche (0000-0003-1596-8658, University of Johannesburg, corresponding author), Nicholas Ngepah (0000-0002-1947-0008, University of Johannesburg), Javier Cifuentes-Faura (0000-0001-6763-8525, Universidad de Murcia)
Year2023
Volume75
Pages102380
Publication date2023-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTechnology in Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0160-791X • E-ISSN: 1879-3274
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102380
OpenAlexW4386954848
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited74

Policy strategies to foster climate-change resilient ecosystems require broad-based identification of the mechanisms underlying the nexus. Prior investigations, maybe, inadvertently left so many factors unverified. Failing to verify, specifically, how climate change is influenced by public-funded research and development (R&D) on energy efficiencies, renewables, nuclear energy, and power storage technologies concealed vital policy insights. We have analyzed a panel series of the aforementioned factors stretching from 1985 to 2021 in the context of G10 countries. Several innovative panel techniques robust to cross-national exigencies were implemented. This includes two recently introduced third-generation panel unit-root procedures, the Banerjee and Carrion-i-Silvestre cointegration process, the fully-generalized least square, panel-corrected standard error, Driscoll-Kray standard errors, and the dynamic common correlated effects estimator. Long-run elasticities informed that total R&D expenditure on green-technologies is more effective in mitigating energy-induced emissions than the overall surface temperature. R&D expenditure on energy efficiencies, renewables, and nuclear energies performed better in minifying both metrics than power storage. Fossil fuel technologies remained inimical to environmental sustainability. Energy-tax promoted environmental quality significantly by reducing both energy emissions and climate temperature. It is commendable to invest more in energy-enhancing technologies but other factors that have a direct bearing on climate-change deserve consideration

Biology · Business · Climate change · Context (archaeology · Economics · Environmental economics · Environmental resource management · Fossil fuel · Geography · Greenhouse gas · Natural resource economics · Nexus (standard · Nuclear power · Renewable energy · Sustainability · Waste management · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Computer Science · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Engineering · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Environmental Science · Ecology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access