Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Paths to research-driven decision making in the realms of environment and water

Bibliographic Data

ID11238437
AuthorsSavannah Cooley (0000-0003-1473-7786, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, corresponding author), Amber Jenkins (Jet Propulsion Laboratory), Blake Schaeffer (0000-0001-9794-3977, Environmental Protection Agency), Kat J Bormann (0000-0003-3697-6550), Adel Abdallah (0000-0002-7271-9941, Council of State Governments), Forrest Melton (0000-0001-8728-0778, Ames Research Center), Stephanie Granger (Jet Propulsion Laboratory), Indrani Graczyk (Jet Propulsion Laboratory)
Year2022
Volume70
Pages101994
Publication date2022-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTechnology in Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0160-791X • E-ISSN: 1879-3274
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101994
PMID39021531
OpenAlexW4281743230
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited65

Now more than ever it is critical for researchers and decision makers to work together to improve how we manage and preserve the planet's natural resources. Water managers in the western U.S., as in many regions of the world, are facing unprecedented challenges including increasing water demands and diminishing or unpredictable supplies. The transfer of knowledge (KT) and technology (TT) between researchers and entities that manage natural resources can help address these issues. However, numerous barriers impede the advancement of such transfer, particularly between organizations that do not operate in a profit-oriented context and for which best practices for university-industry collaborative engagement may not be sufficient. Frameworks designed around environmental KT - such as the recently-developed Research-Integration-Utilization (RIU) model - can be leveraged to address these barriers. Here, we examine two examples in which NASA Earth science satellite data and remote-sensing technology are used to improve the management of water availability and quality. Despite differences in scope and outcomes, both of these case studies adopt KT and TT best practices and can be further understood through the lens of the RIU model. We show how these insights could be adopted by NASA through a conceptual framework that charts individual- and organizational-level integration milestones alongside technical milestones. Environmental organizations can learn from this approach and adapt it to fit their own institutional needs, integrating KT/TT models and best practices while recognizing and leveraging existing institutional logics that suit their organization's unique history, technical capability and priorities

Management science · Operations research · Computer Science · Engineering · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

  • Empowering sustainability in the built environment

    Open Access•Vikrant Pachouri, Rajesh Singh et al.•Technology in Society•2024

  • The Sustainability of University-Industry Research Collaboration

    Open Access•Yong S Lee•The Journal of Technology Transfer•2000

  • Links and Impacts

    Open Access•Wesley M Cohen, Richard R Nelson et al.•Management Science•2002

  • Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration

    Open Access•Johan Bruneel, Pablo D’Este et al.•Research Policy•2010

  • University–industry relationships and open innovation

    Open Access•Markus Perkmann, Kathryn Walsh•International Journal of…•2007

  • Networks of innovators

    Open Access•Christopher Freeman•Research Policy•1991

  • Academic engagement and commercialisation

    Open Access•Markus Perkmann, Valentina Tartari et al.•Research Policy•2013

  • Revisiting the Commons

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром et al.•Science•1999

  • Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage

    Janine Nahapiet, Sumantra Ghoshal•Academy of Management Review•1998

  • Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations

    Edwin Mansfield•The Review of Economics and…•1995

  • The Oxford Handbook of Innovation

    Jan Fagerberg, David C Mowery•The Oxford handbook of innovation•2006

  • Science Makes the World Go Round. Successful Scientific Knowledge Transfer for the Environment

    Open Access•Michael Böcher, Max Krott•European Policy Analysis•2016

  • The politics of co-production

    Open Access•Esther Turnhout, Tamara Metze et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2019

  • Air pollution success stories in the United States

    Open Access•Timothy J Sullivan, Charles T Driscoll et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2018

  • Multiple traps of scientific knowledge transfer

    Open Access•Thi Huong Do, Thi Huong et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2020

  • Value and risks of the use of analytical theory in science for forest policy

    Open Access•Max Krott•Forest Policy and Economics•2010

  • Governing knowledge transfer for deforestation monitoring

    Open Access•R Sufo Kankeu, Moïse Tsayem Demaze et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2019

  • Knowledge transfer between stakeholders in the field of urban forestry and green infrastructure

    Open Access•Francesca Ugolini, Luciano Massetti et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Towards a Coherent Policy of Co–Development

    Open Access•Patrick Weil•International Migration•2002

  • Bridging the Science-Management Divide

    Open Access•Dirk J Roux, Kevin H Rogers et al.•Conservation Ecology•2006

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae