Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Conceptual disruption and 21st century technologies

A framework

Bibliographic Data

ID11239232
AuthorsGuido Löhr (0000-0002-7028-3515, Eindhoven University of Technology, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume74
Pages102327
Publication date2023-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTechnology in Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0160-791X • E-ISSN: 1879-3274
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102327
OpenAlexW4384521230
LanguageEN
Citations received25
References cited28

Modern technologies like artificial intelligence, robotics, geo-engineering, social media, or next-generation genomics have been and will continue to be socially (culturally, economically, legally, etc.) disruptive. Several philosophers of technology have noted that technology is not only socially but also conceptually disruptive. Technologies do not only change the way we live together. They also challenge the way we conceptualize or classify ourselves and the world around us. However, it is not clear what it means for technology to disrupt our concepts, as the very idea of conceptual disruption and its relation to conceptual and social change remain opaque. In what way can technologies disrupt our concepts and how we can overcome such disruptions? This paper proposes a framework for studying technology-induced conceptual disruptions that draws both on mediation theory and recent work on conceptual engineering

Conceptual framework · Disruptive technology · Emerging technologies · Engineering ethics · Knowledge management · Management science · Mediation · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Engineering · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Artificial Intelligence

  • Should we speak of machine agency? A case against conceptual extension

    Open Access•Eloïse Soulier, Eloïse Changyue Soulier•Ethics and Information Technology•2026

  • What is conceptual disruption

    Open Access•Samuela Marchiori, Kevin Scharp•Ethics and Information Technology•2024

  • Engineering the trust machine. Aligning the concept of trust in the context of blockchain applications

    Open Access•Eva Pöll•Ethics and Information Technology•2024

  • Technology and pronouns

    Open Access•Maren Behrensen•Ethics and Information Technology•2024

  • Technologically mediated encounters with ‘nature’

    Open Access•Patricia D Reyes Benavides•Ethics and Information Technology•2024

  • Socially Disruptive Technologies and Conceptual Engineering

    Open Access•Herman Veluwenkamp, Jeroen Hopster et al.•Ethics and Information Technology•2024

  • Conceptual Mediation in Technomoral Change

    Open Access•Jeroen Hopster, Jon Rueda Etxeberria et al.•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2026

  • Who owns Nature? Conceptual appropriation in discourses on climate and biotechnologies

    Open Access•Jeroen Hopster, Jeroen K G Hopster et al.•Environmental Values•2024

  • “What shall I say now?” A normative-inferentialist account of open texture

    Open Access•Céline Henne•Linguistics and Philosophy•2026

  • Concepts as artefacts. Three insights that conceptual engineering can draw from the philosophy of technology

    Open Access•Samuela Marchiori•Inquiry•2026

  • The distinction between generic and specific concepts and why it matters for conceptual engineering

    Open Access•I Van De Poel•Inquiry•2025

  • Public views on research with publicly available data in Switzerland

    Open Access•Paola Daniore, Jana Sedlakova et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2025

  • Socially Disruptive Technologies, Moral Progress, and Rule Following

    Open Access•Betty Lane•Philosophy & Technology•2025

  • Conceptualising conceptual resilience. A comparative approach

    Open Access•Samuela Marchiori, Joseph Emmanuel D Sta Maria et al.•Philosophy & Technology•2026

  • Conceptual Engineering and Philosophy of Technology

    Open Access•Jeroen Hopster, Guido Löhr•Philosophy & Technology•2023

  • Rethinking Disruptive Technologies

    Open Access•Sabrina Coninx, Guido Löhr•Philosophy & Technology•2026

  • Civilization chronicles

    Open Access•Dion Satrio Nugroho•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  • Exploring regional vulnerability to the Fourth Industrial Revolution

    Open Access•Anastasia Panori•Regional Studies Regional Science•2025

  • Disruptive technologies, engineered concepts, and normative guidance

    Open Access•Aurélie Halsband•Ethics and Information Technology•2025

  • Public attitudes and sentiments toward ChatGPT in China

    Open Access•Ying Lian, Huiting Tang et al.•Technology in Society•2024

  • In search of better methods for the longitudinal assessment of tech-derived X-risks

    Open Access•Trond Arne Undheim•Technology in Society•2024

  • Moral certainty, deep disagreement, and disruption

    Open Access•Julia Hermann•Synthese•2025

  • Disruptive Technologies for e-Diasporas

    Open Access•I Calzada•Futures•2023

  • Defining socially disruptive technologies and reframing the ethical challenges they pose

    Open Access•Joel Anderson, Jeroen Hopster et al.•Technology in Society•2026

  • You're changing the subject

    Open Access•Delia Belleri•The Philosophical Quarterly•2025

  • Truth-Conditional Pragmatics

    François Recanati•Truth-conditional pragmatics•2010

  • Technology and the Lifeworld

    Don Ihde•Technology and the Lifeworld•1990

  • The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Technology

    Shannon ca /21 Jh Vallor, Shannon Vallor•Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of…•2022

  • What Does It Mean for a Robot to Be Respectful

    Dina Babushkina•Techné Research in Philosophy and…•2022

  • Linguistic Interventions and the Ethics of Conceptual Disruption

    Open Access•Guido Löhr•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2022

  • Who owns Nature? Conceptual appropriation in discourses on climate and biotechnologies

    Open Access•Jeroen Hopster, Jeroen K G Hopster et al.•Environmental Values•2024

  • Conceptual engineering

    Amie L Thomasson, Amie Thomasson•Inquiry•2025

  • Conceptual engineering and the implementation problem

    Open Access•Sigurd Jorem•Inquiry•2021

  • Do Artifacts Have Politics

    Langdon Winner•Computer Ethics•2017

  • Discipline and Punish

    Open Access•Michel Foucault•On Violence•2020

  • Disruptive Innovation and Moral Uncertainty

    Open Access•Philip J Nickel•NanoEthics•2020

  • Obstetric Ultrasound and the Technological Mediation of Morality

    Open Access•Peter-Paul Verbeek•Human Studies•2008

  • What are socially disruptive technologies

    Open Access•Jeroen Hopster•Technology in Society•2021

  • Do socially disruptive technologies really change our concepts or just our conceptions

    Open Access•Guido Löhr•Technology in Society•2023

  • Social constructionism, concept acquisition and the mismatch problem

    Open Access•Guido Löhr•Synthese•2021

  • Engineering what? On concepts in conceptual engineering

    Open Access•Koch•Synthese•2021

  • Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies

    Open Access•Lorina Buhr, I R van de Poel et al.•Ethics of Socially Disruptive…•2023

  • Conceptual engineering

    Open Access•Manuel Gustavo Isaac, Koch et al.•Philosophy Compass•2022

Unique citing works25
Citations per year8,33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 25

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae