Conceptual disruption and 21st century technologies
A framework
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11239232 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Guido Löhr (0000-0002-7028-3515, Eindhoven University of Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 74 |
| Pages | 102327 |
| Publication date | 2023-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Technology in Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0160-791X • E-ISSN: 1879-3274 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102327 |
| OpenAlex | W4384521230 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 25 |
| References cited | 28 |
Modern technologies like artificial intelligence, robotics, geo-engineering, social media, or next-generation genomics have been and will continue to be socially (culturally, economically, legally, etc.) disruptive. Several philosophers of technology have noted that technology is not only socially but also conceptually disruptive. Technologies do not only change the way we live together. They also challenge the way we conceptualize or classify ourselves and the world around us. However, it is not clear what it means for technology to disrupt our concepts, as the very idea of conceptual disruption and its relation to conceptual and social change remain opaque. In what way can technologies disrupt our concepts and how we can overcome such disruptions? This paper proposes a framework for studying technology-induced conceptual disruptions that draws both on mediation theory and recent work on conceptual engineering
Conceptual framework · Disruptive technology · Emerging technologies · Engineering ethics · Knowledge management · Management science · Mediation · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Engineering · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Artificial Intelligence
Should we speak of machine agency? A case against conceptual extension
What is conceptual disruption
Engineering the trust machine. Aligning the concept of trust in the context of blockchain applications
Technology and pronouns
Technologically mediated encounters with ‘nature’
Socially Disruptive Technologies and Conceptual Engineering
Conceptual Mediation in Technomoral Change
Who owns Nature? Conceptual appropriation in discourses on climate and biotechnologies
“What shall I say now?” A normative-inferentialist account of open texture
Concepts as artefacts. Three insights that conceptual engineering can draw from the philosophy of technology
The distinction between generic and specific concepts and why it matters for conceptual engineering
Public views on research with publicly available data in Switzerland
Socially Disruptive Technologies, Moral Progress, and Rule Following
Conceptualising conceptual resilience. A comparative approach
Conceptual Engineering and Philosophy of Technology
Rethinking Disruptive Technologies
Civilization chronicles
Exploring regional vulnerability to the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Disruptive technologies, engineered concepts, and normative guidance
Public attitudes and sentiments toward ChatGPT in China
In search of better methods for the longitudinal assessment of tech-derived X-risks
Moral certainty, deep disagreement, and disruption
Disruptive Technologies for e-Diasporas
Defining socially disruptive technologies and reframing the ethical challenges they pose
You're changing the subject
Truth-Conditional Pragmatics
Technology and the Lifeworld
The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Technology
What Does It Mean for a Robot to Be Respectful
Linguistic Interventions and the Ethics of Conceptual Disruption
Who owns Nature? Conceptual appropriation in discourses on climate and biotechnologies
Conceptual engineering
Conceptual engineering and the implementation problem
Do Artifacts Have Politics
Discipline and Punish
Disruptive Innovation and Moral Uncertainty
Obstetric Ultrasound and the Technological Mediation of Morality
What are socially disruptive technologies
Do socially disruptive technologies really change our concepts or just our conceptions
Social constructionism, concept acquisition and the mismatch problem
Engineering what? On concepts in conceptual engineering
Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies
Conceptual engineering
| Unique citing works | 25 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 8,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 25 |