Missing, Biased, and Unrepresentative
The Quantitative Analysis of Multisource Biographical Data
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11253643 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Gidon Cohen (0000-0002-9899-5389, University of Salford, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2002 |
| Volumen | 35 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 166-176 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2002-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0161-5440 • E-ISSN: 1940-1906 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01615440209601206 |
| OpenAlex | W2015315121 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 6 |
| Referencias citadas | 25 |
With the growth in interest in collective biography as a historical technique, many predominantly qualitative historians find themselves faced with large amounts of information. These data, collected from a variety of sources, are often highly irregular, making statistical analysis extremely problematic. Current practice is to ignore these problems and proceed with quantitative analysis suitable only for much more regular data. It is argued that a more satisfactory approach is to ascertain and directly confront the difficulties of analyzing such information. The three central problems are identified as missing data, systematic bias, and the lack of a representative sample. Using a practical example, the author explores the relationship between gender, the family, and political socialization within the Communist Party of Great Britain and shows how each of the issues can be dealt with in turn. The author first distinguishes truly missing data from “negative information,” which commonly appears to be missing in historical sources. He then stratifies the data to remove systematic biases relating to the issue at hand. Finally, he divides the sample into different populations, on the basis of the sources from which individuals are known, and compares the results obtained to examine whether his conclusions appear to depend on quirks of populations contained in the sources. These ideas open a new range of sources to quantitative analysis and raise the possibility of allowing new types of evidence to count in historical inquiry
Data science · Epistemology · Missing data · Political science · Politics · Quantitative analysis (chemistry · Sample (material · Social science · Socialization · Sociology · Statistics · Variety (cybernetics · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Mathematics
Strikes and Solidarity
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
The Effectiveness of Adjustment by Subclassification in Removing Bias in Observational Studies
Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score
Inference and missing data
Equivocal Feminists
Do Historians Count Anymore
Log-linear analysis of contingency tables
Which Road to the past? Two Views of History
Interpreting the Self
An Introduction to Quantitative Methods for Historians
The New History and the Old
Nuptiality and Age At Marriage in Nineteenth-Century England
Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data
Labour Women
Databases in Historical Research
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,26 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2003 - 2015 (13) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |