Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Course evaluations and pedagogy

Experience with a build‐your‐own course evaluation

Bibliographic Data

ID11258257
AuthorsWilliam Ray Arney (Dartmouth College, corresponding author)
Year1979
Volume57
Issue1
Pages47-55
Publication date1979-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePeabody Journal of Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0161-956X • E-ISSN: 1532-7930
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01619567909538266
OpenAlexW2033274683
LanguageEN
References cited1

Behind every good questionnaire lies a theory. This is just as true for the questionnaires that we routinely use to evaluate courses as it is for our survey instruments. The form course evaluations usually take is one manifestation of a mechanistic pedagogy which pervades institutions of higher education; continued use of conventional evaluation strategies perpetuates a mechanistic pedagogy; and, contrary to most stated reasons for doing course evaluations, their use can contribute to professional stagnation. I will discuss a method of course evaluation consistent with a pedagogy that moves one step, albeit a small one, beyond the stance most of us assume toward students and education

Course (navigation · Course evaluation · Higher education · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Political science · Engineering · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Psychology · Reflective Practices in Education · Student Assessment and Feedback

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae