Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Gender Differences in Support for Scientific Involvement in U.S. Environmental Policy

Bibliographic Data

ID11261319
AuthorsBrent S Steel (0000-0003-0081-340X, Oregon State University, corresponding author), Rebecca L Warner (Oregon State University), Denise Lach (Oregon State University)
Year2010
Volume35
Issue2
Pages147-173
Publication date2010-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0162243909340259
OpenAlexW2144820771
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited32

Many studies have documented gender differences in attitudes toward and experiences with science. Compared to men, for example, women are less likely to study science and to pursue careers in science-related fields. Given these findings, should we expect gender differences in support for scientific involvement in U.S. environmental policy? This study empirically examines the relationship of gender to attitudes toward science and preferred roles of scientists in environmental policy among various environmental policy participants. Data collected in 2006 and 2007 from national surveys of four different groups involved in environmental policy and management suggest that social context, including education and occupation, shapes the way that gender matters. Specifically, we find that gender is less important among scientists and managers than among interest groups and the general population regarding attitudes toward science and views about preferred roles of scientists in environmental decision making

Context (archaeology · Environmental policy · Geography · Political science · Population · Sociology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education · Demography · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Learning in Support of Governance

    Open Access•Beatrice Crona, Beatrice I Crona et al.•Conservation Ecology•2012

  • Knowledge, risk, and policy support

    Open Access•James W Stoutenborough, Shelbi G Sturgess et al.•Energy Policy•2013

  • Women in innovation processes as a solution to climate change

    Open Access•Severine Le Loarne Lemaire, Séverine Le Loarne-Lemaire et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Contested evidence

    Open Access•Paul R Brewer, Barbara L Ley•Public Understanding of Science•2014

  • Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment

    Open Access•Paul R Brewer, Barbara L Ley•Science Communication•2013

  • Who trusts whom in the Great Barrier Reef? Exploring trust and communication in natural resource management

    Open Access•Tracy Mackeracher, Amy Diedrich et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2018

  • An empirical test of anchoring the NEP scale in environmental ethics

    C L Noblet, Mark Anderson et al.•Environmental Education Research•2012

  • Group Identities, Value Orientations, and Public Preferences for Energy and Water Resource Management Policy Approaches in the American West

    Muhammad Usman Amin Siddiqi, Erika Allen Wolters•Society & Natural Resources•2023

  • Selling Science

    Dorothy Nelkin•Selling Science•1988

  • Science Studies

    David J Hess•Science Studies•2020

  • Science, Scientists, and Policy Advocacy

    Open Access•Robert T Lackey•Conservation Biology•2007

  • Thinking Globally and Acting Locally?

    Open Access•Brent S Steel•Journal of Environmental Management•1996

  • Gender and Environmental Risk Concerns

    Open Access•D J Davidson, Wiluam R Freudenburg•Environment and Behavior•1996

  • Objective Knowledge

    Karl Popper, Jeremy Shearmur•Objective Knowledge•2026

  • Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science

    Open Access•Bernadette C Hayes, Vicki Tariq et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2000

  • Ideology and scientific credibility

    Open Access•Brent S Steel, Denise Lach et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2006

  • Gender Differences in Attitudes toward Science in Switzerland

    Open Access•Fabienne Crettaz Von Roten•Public Understanding of Science•2004

  • Public Understanding of, and Attitudes toward, Scientific Research

    Open Access•Jon D Miller•Public Understanding of Science•2004

  • Civic Science for Sustainability

    Karin Bäckstrand•Global Environmental Politics•2003

  • The role of scientists in the environmental policy process

    Open Access•Brent S Steel, Brent Steel et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2003

  • Exploring the Gender Gap in Young Adults' Attitudes about Animal Research

    Linda Kimmel Pifer•Society and Animals•1996

  • Men, women, and the environment

    Paul Mohai•Society & Natural Resources•1992

  • Resources and strategies of interest groups and industry representatives involved in federal forest policy

    Open Access•Brent S Steel•The Social Science Journal•1996

  • Cross‐National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors

    Open Access•Lori M Hunter, Alison Hatch et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2004

  • New Ways of Thinking about Environmentalism

    Open Access•Lynnette C Zelezny, Lynnette Zelezny et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2000

  • Tracking the Elusive Green Women

    Open Access•Mark Somma, Sue Tolleson-Rinehart et al.•Political Research Quarterly•1997

  • New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes

    Open Access•Riley E Dunlap, Kent D Van Liere et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2000

  • Politics and Environment in America

    Riley E Dunlap, Chenyang Xiao et al.•Environmental Politics•2001

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0,57
Citation span2012 - 2023 (12)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae