Muting the Alarm over the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
The New York Times versus Haaretz , 2000–06
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11262023 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jerome Slater (0000-0001-9460-5630, Jerome Slater is University Research Scholar at the State University of New York at Buffalo. He is at work on a book on U.S. policy and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict., corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 84-120 |
| Publication date | 2007-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Security (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-2889 • E-ISSN: 1531-4804 |
| Publisher | MIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1162/isec.2007.32.2.84 |
| OpenAlex | W2144925290 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 14 |
The prospects for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remain poor, largely because of Israeli rigidity as well as Palestinian policies and internal conflicts. The United States has failed to use its considerable influence with Israel to seek the necessary changes in Israeli policies, instead providing the country with almost unconditional support. The consequences have been disastrous for the Palestinians, for Israeli security and society, and for critical U.S. national interests in the Middle East. Amajor explanation for the failure of U.S. policies is the largely uninformed and uncritical mainstream and even elite media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the United States. In contrast, the debate in Israel is more self-critical, vigorous, and far-ranging, creating at least the possibility of change, even as U.S. policy stagnates. Acomparison of the coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by the two most prestigious daily newspapers in the United States and Israel—in particular, over the breakdown of the peace process in 2000 and the ensuing Palestinian intifada, the nature of the Israeli occupation, the problem of violence and terrorism, and the prospects for peace today—underscores these differences. While the New York Times has muted the alarm over the dangers of the United States' near-unconditional support for Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, Haaretz has sought to sound the alarm
Arab–Israeli conflict · Development economics · Economics · Elite · Mainstream · Middle East · National security · Newspaper · Palestinian refugees · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Terrorism · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Surrogate Ethnocentrism in U.S. Media Coverage of the 2023 to 2025 Israel–Gaza War
Closets and institutions
Death is in the eye of the beholder
Narratives used to portray in-group terrorists
Strategy and Two-Level Games
Japan as a Seapower
Foreign cues and public views on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict
Telling-it-like-it-is
Ontological dissonance, clashing identities, and Israel's unilateral steps towards the Palestinians
The Showdown That Wasn't
The Gaza Strip
Only the beginning
The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy
Ideology vs. The National Interest
F Encing the L Ast S Ky
The Camp David Papers
F ebruary ––15 M ay 2006
Clinton and the Arab-Israeli Conflict
Visions in Collision
From Oslo to Taba
Just and Unjust Wars
The Truth about Camp David
What Went Wrong? The Collapse of the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,59 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2026 (18) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |