Partnership or Predation? How Rising States Contend with Declining Great Powers
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11262151 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Joshua R Itzkowitz Shifrinson, Joshua Shifrinson (0000-0003-1085-5021, Boston University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 90-126 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Security (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0162-2889 • E-ISSN: 1531-4804 |
| Editora | MIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1162/isec_a_00384 |
| OpenAlex | W3042680875 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 23 |
International relations scholarship overwhelmingly expects that relatively rising states will threaten and challenge declining great powers. In practice, however, rising states can also cooperate with and support declining powers. What explains the rising state's choice of policy? When do rising states support or prey on declining great powers, and why do such strategies vary across time and space? The answer depends on the rising state's broader strategic calculations. All things being equal, a rising state will generally support a declining power when the latter can be used to offset threats from other great powers that can harm the rising state's security. Conversely, when using a declining state to offset such challenges is not a plausible option, the rising state is likely to pursue a predation strategy. The level of assertiveness of support or predation, meanwhile, depends on the declining power's military posture: the stronger the declining state is militarily, the less assertive the rising state tends to be. A review of the strategies adopted by two relatively rising powers, the United States and the Soviet Union, toward a declining Great Britain after 1945, and of a rising United States vis-à-vis a declining Soviet Union in the late Cold War, illustrates how this argument outperforms explanations that focus instead on the importance of economic interdependence and ideology
Development economics · Economics · Great power · Ideology · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Scholarship · State (computer science · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
The War Scare of 1946 and Its Consequences
Labourite Britain
Skepticism and Stability
Military Diplomacy in the Dual Alliance
Exit stratgies
Preventive War
Ernest Bevin, France and 'Western Union
The Failures of the ‘Failure of Engagement’ with China
To Arm or to Ally? The Patron's Dilemma and the Strategic Logic of Arms Transfers and Alliances
Deal or No Deal? The End of the Cold War and the U.S. Offer to Limit Nato Expansion
Stalin's Postwar Army Reappraised
Back to the Future
Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation
Britain and the Dunkirk Treaty
Competing with China
Declining Power and the Preventive Motivation for War
What China Will Want
A world economy restored
The United States and the End of the Cold War
How Dominant Narratives Rise and Fall
Chain gangs and passed bucks
Why China Has Not Caught Up Yet
The Theory of Hegemonic War
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,4 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2021 - 2022 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |