Wars without Gun Smoke”
Global Supply Chains, Power Transitions, and Economic Statecraft
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11262227 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ling S Chen (0000-0002-2187-4263, John Brown University, corresponding author), Miles M Evers (0000-0003-2505-5908, John Brown University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 164-204 |
| Publication date | 2023-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Security (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-2889 • E-ISSN: 1531-4804 |
| Publisher | MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1162/isec_a_00473 |
| OpenAlex | W4388625701 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 37 |
| References cited | 7 |
Conventional wisdom holds that conflict is highly likely during a power transition between declining and rising powers. The spread of global supply chains has provided new economic weapons for great powers waging these conflicts, but the businesses that constitute global supply chains can make it harder or easier for them to do so. A structural theory of business-state relations shows how power transitions affect a state's ability to exercise economic statecraft. As a dominant power and a rising power approach parity, they face structural incentives to use economic statecraft to decouple their economies. The resulting threat to businesses’ profits changes business-state relations: high-value businesses within the dominant power tend to oppose their state's use of economic statecraft, whereas low-value businesses within the rising power tend to cooperate with their state's use of economic statecraft. The Anglo-German power transition from 1890 to 1914 and the U.S.-China power transition since 1990 illustrate the theory. The findings shift scholarly debates on the use of economic statecraft in modern great power competition and have policy implications for weaponizing supply chains against rising powers like China
Business · China · Competition (biology · Economic power · Economic system · Economics · Economy · Great power · Incentive · Market economy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · State (computer science · Value (mathematics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Political Conflict and Governance
The Politics of Information in an Age of Weaponized Interdependence
The states–markets–decarbonization nexus
Divide and Conquer
Staying or Leaving? How Businesses Take Action Towards Economic Sanctions and Evidence from the Russia–Ukraine War
Rescaling Geoeconomics
Governments and Markets in the Digital Age
How Do Uncertainties Reshape Supply Chain Efficiency? In an Era of Turbulence
China’s Arrival in the Great Sanctions Game
Shadowboxing
The Business Security Dilemma
Escaping a weaponized network
A new Thucydides Trap? How traditional defense buildups can exacerbate contemporary power decline
Trump
Trump
Taking the EU Seriously
From totality to hybridity and beyond
The China Gambit
The EU's China Strategies
Navigating ethical boundaries
Cooptation in great power rivalries
From rivals to partners
Unpacking the target state response to wedging and binding strategies
Digital corporate autonomy
Which side are you on? Geoeconomic coercion and German corporate networks in the US–China rivalry
When an ant becomes a pest
Balancing security and economics
The dog that does not bark – Weaponised interdependence and digital trade at the World Trade Organization
The political power of digital multinational companies in an era of geo-technological competition
Political risk and firm exit
Trade agreements and environmental provisions
Complex global value chains and economic interdependence
An Evermore Geoeconomic European Union? Exploring Critical Perspectives for Future Research
EU AI sovereignty
Towards an Innovative Leviathan? “Made in China” Remade -- Evidence from Firm Value Decomposition Analysis
Securitized political economy, investment regulation and business influence in a geoeconomic era
Agents and opponents of neoliberal globalization
Carrots or sticks? Analyzing the application of US economic statecraft towards Latin American engagement with China
| Unique citing works | 37 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 12.33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 36 |