Selective Wilsonianism
Material Interests and the West's Support for Democracy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11262537 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Arman Grigoryan (Lehigh University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 158-200 |
| Publication date | 2020-04-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Security (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-2889 • E-ISSN: 1531-4804 |
| Publisher | MIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1162/isec_a_00378 |
| OpenAlex | W3017171468 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 13 |
When a mass movement broke out in 2013 against the corrupt government of Viktor Yanukovich in Ukraine, the United States and its West European allies mobilized to support it. The policy was justified by the Wilsonian logic of promoting democracy and celebrated as such by liberals. Realists for the most part agreed with the liberal argument regarding the motive of that support, but criticized it as delusional and argued that the subsequent civil war in Ukraine was the consequence of that policy. This is a puzzle, because five years prior to the Ukrainian events, a mass movement had rocked Armenia— another post-Soviet state. The West's attitude toward that movement, however, ranged from indifference to hostility, even though the Wilsonian motives for supporting that movement should have been stronger. The difference in the West's response resulted from the different positions of the two movements toward Russia: the Ukrainian movement was intensely hostile toward Russia, whereas the Armenian movement was not. In other words, where Wilsonianism dovetailed with a geopolitical motive, it was triggered; where it diverged, Wilsonianism remained dormant. This is not a deviation from the general pattern either. Contrary to the popular narrative, the West has supported democracy only when that support has been reinforced by material interests, and rarely, if ever, when it has posed a threat to such interests
Argument (complex analysis · Democracy · Geopolitics · Hostility · Movement (music · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Ukrainian · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics · Social Psychology
Taiwan and the Danger of a Sino-American War
The Meddling American Voter? How Norms, Interests, and Great Power Rivalries Affect U.S. Public Support for Partisan Electoral Interventions Abroad
US Alliance management in the shadow of sino-American competition
Safe over similar? A structural interpretation of changing patterns in U.S. democracy promotion
The harsh face of the empire by invitation
Race, Religion, and American Support for Humanitarian Intervention
Philosophy and Public Affairs
Legacies and Leverage
The Invisible Hand of the American Empire
A Defensible Defense
The Roots of the Bush Doctrine
The Karabakh conflict and Armenia's failed transition
The flawed logic of Nato expansion
National Interest and American Intervention, 1917
Ghana’s Encouraging Elections
When the Great Power Gets a Vote
Third-Party Intervention and the Escalation of State-Minority Conflicts1
Taking Preferences Seriously
What Have We Learned About the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |