Going Just a Little Nuclear
Nonproliferation Lessons from North Korea
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11262877 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael J Mazarr (0009-0002-5768-7344, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1995 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 92 |
| Publication date | 1995-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Security (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-2889 • E-ISSN: 1531-4804 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2539230 |
| OpenAlex | W1984470083 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 6 |
Nonproliferation in the 1990s and beyond will be an enormously difficult challenge. In large part this is true because the only road map for such efforts merely points us in a general direction. The lay of the land, its contours and pathways, the barriers to progress and the bridges over them will only become apparent when we lay that map over a specific case. And once apparent, they will show a geopolitical topography that is maddeningly complex. In particular, the long-term success of the October 1994 North Korean-U.S. nuclear deal is by no means guaranteed. The agreement calls for the sort of nuanced, patient engagement of the North that the United States and its allies have so far proven incapable of conducting. Already, one major step toward a resolution of the nuclear issue has fallen victim to failed implementation: the process that was underway in 1992, when North Korea accepted inspections only to see U.S.-South Korean diplomacy collapse during the second half of the year. What the Agreed Framework will mean for the future is not completely clear, but this much is certain: if the United States stamps the Korean nuclear issue {open_quotes}solved{close_quotes} and turns to other crises, the agreementmore » will collapse. Only by a continuous and energetic follow-up process of engagement and reconciliation with North Korea can the United States and its allies make this deal stick. 47 refs.« less
Business · International trade · Nuclear weapon · Political science · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense
North Korea and the Global Nuclear Order
The Evolution of International Security Studies
Nuclear Proliferation and Nonproliferation among Soviet Allies
Leveraging towards restraint
Reinterpreting Libya's WMD Turnaround – Bridging the Carrot-Coercion Divide
From Lambs to Lions
Restraining the Hegemon
The World vs. Kim Jong-il
Peace psychology in Asia
A cultural neuroscience perspective on North Korean strategic culture
Proliferación Nuclear de Corea del Norte
Rewards versus Sanctions in International Relations
Why Nuclear Energy Programs Rarely Lead to Proliferation
East Asian‐pacific security
Pretoria and Pyongyang
The Study of Appeasement in International Relations
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,55 |
| Citation span | 1997 - 2023 (27) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |