Sentience, Communal Relations, and Moral Status
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11266543 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Austin Coates (0000-0001-8557-3163, corresponding author), Ashley Coates |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 141-158 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0163-4275 • E-ISSN: 2153-7895 |
| Publisher | Philosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5840/enviroethics202572197 |
| OpenAlex | W4412733133 |
| Language | EN |
Thaddeus Metz has developed and defended a “modal-relational” account of moral status based on his interpretation of salient Sub-Saharan African values. Roughly, on this account, a being has moral status to the degree it can enter into friendly or communal relationships with characteristic human beings. In this paper, it is argued that this theory’s true significance for environmental ethics has thus far not been recognized. Metz’s own view is that the theory entails that only sentient beings have moral status. It is argued here this is a mistake, and, once this error is corrected, the view can be used to synthesize major, competing accounts of moral status into a novel, unified account of the moral status of human beings, sentient animals, non-sentient organisms, and inanimate members of the “web of life.” The result is a new framework for thinking about the moral status of various natural entities, which ought to be of great interest to environmental ethicists
Applied philosophy · Contemporary philosophy · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · General interest · Sentience · Sociology · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity · Religion and Society Interactions · Religious Education and Schools
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |