Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Intergenerational Justice and Curtailments on the Discretionary Powers of Governments

Bibliographic Data

ID11266746
AuthorsPaul M Wood (corresponding author)
Year2004
Volume26
Issue4
Pages411-428
Publication date2004-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0163-4275 • E-ISSN: 2153-7895
PublisherPhilosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.5840/enviroethics20042646
OpenAlexW2017175769
LanguageEN
Citations received5

Governments of all nations presume they possess full discretionary policymaking powers over the lands and waters within their geopolitical boundaries. At least one global environmental issue—the rapid loss of the world’s biodiversity, the sixth major mass extinction event in geological time—challenges the legitimacy of this presumption. Increment by increment, the present generation is depleting the world’s biodiversity by way of altering species’ habitats for the sake of short term economic gain. When biodiversity is understood as an essential environmental condition—essential in the long term because it is the source of the biological resources upon which humans depend—then the strongly differential distribution of benefits and burdens between generations raises an issue of intergenerational justice. We receive the short-term benefits of economic development; future generations will receive the resulting burden of a biosphere in which one of the life-support systems necessary for humanity will have been compromised. Using Ronald Dworkin’s conceptions of distributive justice, it can be demonstrated that constitutional constraints on the discretionary powers of governments, for the sake of intergenerational justice, are entirely consistent with central tenets of liberal democracy. As a result, we should abandon to some extent the presumption that governments have full jurisdiction over the lands and waters within their boundaries

Biodiversity · Biology · Development economics · Economic Justice · Economics · Environmental justice · Geopolitics · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Natural resource economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presumption · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Ecology

  • Adaptive capacity and learning to learn as leverage for social–ecological resilience

    Open Access•I Fazey, John A Fazey et al.•Frontiers in Ecology and the…•2007

  • How is it Possible for Democracies to Effectively Tackle Long-Term Problems

    Yukio Adachi•Journal of Comparative Policy…•2018

  • A history of the future of higher education for sustainable development

    Kate Sherren•Environmental Education Research•2008

  • A Dilemma of Green Democracy

    Open Access•John K Wong, James K Wong•Political Studies•2016

  • Do global climate change and the interest of future generations have implications for democracy

    Ludvig Beckman•Environmental Politics•2008

Citations per year0.26
Citation span2007 - 2018 (12)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae