Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Motivating (or Baby-Stepping Toward) a Global Constitutional Convention for Future Generation

Bibliographic Data

ID11267013
AuthorsStephen M Gardiner (0000-0001-7813-6133, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume41
Issue3
Pages199-220
Publication date2019-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0163-4275 • E-ISSN: 2153-7895
PublisherPhilosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.5840/enviroethics201941322
OpenAlexW3032596200
LanguageEN
Citations received4

Recently, I have been arguing for a global constitutional convention focused on protecting future generations. This deliberative body would be akin to the American constitutional convention of 1787, which gave rise to the present structure of government in the United States. It would confront the “governance gap” that currently exists surrounding concern for future generations. In particular, contemporary institutions tend to crowd out intergenerational concern, and thereby facilitate a “tyranny of the contemporary.” They not only fail to address a basic standing threat to humanity and other species, but help that threat become manifest. Climate change is a prime example. In this paper, I sketch out a natural argumentative path toward the global constitutional convention and argue that is difficult to resist. I also insist that we should be evenhanded in the way we treat the proposal. Those who put their faith in alternatives (e.g., the emergence of a great leader, a grand alignment of interests, bottom up climate anarchism, or national governments understood as effective intergenerational stewards) must also confront standard complaints about naivety, urgency, threats to democratic values, and the like. Moreover, the global constitutional convention has the advantage of addressing the problem we face head on

Convention · Democracy · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Environmental Philosophy and Ethics · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • Why Democrats Should Be Committed to Future Generations

    Open Access•Matthias Fritsch•Dialogue•2023

  • Climate Crisis, Institutional Denial, and a Global Constitutional Convention for Future Generations

    Stephen M Gardiner•Social Philosophy Today•2024

  • Intergenerational Ethics and Climate Change

    Open Access•Marion Hourdequin•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2025

  • Defending Future Generations Against the Radical Egalitarian Impulse and Lemon Egalitarianism

    Open Access•Stephen M Gardiner•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2025

Unique citing works4
Citations per year1,33
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae