Narrowcasting collective memory online
‘Liking’ Stalin in Russian social media
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11268902 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daria Khlevniuk (0000-0003-1019-2192, Stony Brook University, corresponding author), Daria Khlevnyuk (Stony Brook University) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 317-331 |
| Publication date | 2019-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Media Culture & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0163-4437 • E-ISSN: 1460-3675 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0163443718799401 |
| OpenAlex | W2891198814 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 32 |
The Internet has transformed history and collective memory. Narratives of the past are produced and perceived faster and by larger communities. In other words, the Internet facilitates the most pervasive broadcasting of historical narratives ever known. However, it is not only speed and reach that characterize the impact of the digital revolution on memory cultures. It has also led to a shift from broadcasting to narrowcasting, propelled by a growing number of online memory agents. As a great number of people have access to the Internet, even memory agents with a particular view on the past can find their audience. Thus, the Internet, and social media in particular, facilitates the fragmentation of memory and narrowcasting. To illustrate this point, I studied Russian social media groups dedicated to the adoration of Stalin. Generally, Stalinists are perceived as a homogeneous group sharing a glorified memory of the Soviet leader. However, my analysis reveals that there are at least three types of online Stalinism that promote different narratives and have different agendas. This finding is not merely shedding new light on the persistence of the Stalin cult, but is also theoretically generative, indicating additional conditions for the fragmentation of memories in countries with contested and toxic pasts
Art · Collective memory · Digital media · Liminality · Literature · Media studies · Narrative · Political science · Social media · Sociology · The Internet · World Wide Web · Asian Culture and Media Studies · Computer Science · Law · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Rhetoric and Communication Studies
Five Unknown Facts about
Why is Russian Domestic War Propaganda so Effective
The Big data analysis on historical tweets on Indonesian Heroes' day
Re-meme-bering pedagogies of Great Patriotic War
Parsing the Interactive Construction of Crisis Memory on Social Media
Difficult heritage on social network sites
An Ontology of Semiotic Activity and Epistemic Figuration of Heritage, Memory and Identity Practices on Social Network Sites
Sharing ‘memories’ on Instagram
Media Trauma Hotspot Embracing Exaggerated Covid ‐19 Mortality Reporting
Silencing” or “Magnifying” Memories? Stalin’s Repressions and the 1990s in Russian Museums
Eclipsing Stalin
The Patriotic Turn and Re-Building Russia’s Historical Memory
Exhibitions on Soviet Repressions at the Moscow NGO Memorial (2011–2021)
Depicting the Convicts
Regional Memories of the Great Terror
Introduction to the Special Issue on Under Communism’s Shadow
Re-meme-bering Tiananmen? From collective memory to meta-memory on TikTok
Politics of Memory and Nationalism
Fighting the Online War
Monuments beyond on-the-ground battlefields
When Monument Battles Go Digital
Escaping the Long Shadow of Homo Sovieticus
Save As … Digital Memories
Mythmaking in the New Russia
Digital Network Memory
Between Archive and Participation
Introduction
The Holocaust and memory in the global age
Myth, Memory, Trauma
Convergence Culture
Memory, Conflict and New Media
The strategies of mnemonic battle
Still Broadcasting the Campaign
Website of memory
Technologies of memory
Reconciliation with – or rehabilitation of – the Soviet past
Online war memorials
Web-Based Memorializing After September 11
The Internet and Political Participation
In digital remembrance
Victims of Soviet Terror
Redesigning History in Contemporary Russia
Myths and Memories of the N1ation
Media, Memory, Metaphor
History as ideology
Witnessing in the age of the database
The Prosumption of Commemoration
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,67 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 21 |