Is China Pursuing Counter-Intervention
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11269657 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Timothy Heath, Timothy R Heath (corresponding author), Andrew S Erickson (0009-0004-4609-744X) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 143-156 |
| Publication date | 2015-07-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Washington Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0163-660X • E-ISSN: 1530-9177 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0163660x.2015.1099029 |
| OpenAlex | W1856537310 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
The term “counter-invention” has become burdened with conflated meanings and thus controversial in describing aspects of Chinese national and military strategy. Yet, the term should be retained although refined in two ways to help U.S. policymakers and planners devise appropriate responses to Chinese behavior aimed at undermining U.S. leadership in Asia
China · Conflation · Epistemology · Intervention (counseling · Political science · Public relations · Term (time · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Philosophy · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.44 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |