What's wrong with American Taiwan policy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11271015 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew J Nathan (0009-0008-0700-9573, Columbia University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 91-106 |
| Publication date | 2000-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Washington Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0163-660X • E-ISSN: 1530-9177 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1162/016366000560980 |
| OpenAlex | W2118416857 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 4 |
American efforts to reassure Beijing have confused our Taiwan policy, increasing the risk of war. The United States needs to return to a policy that worked well for a quarter century: combining clarity about ends with “strategic ambiguity” about the means
Ambiguity · Beijing · China · CLARITY · Development economics · Economics · Political science · Quarter (Canadian coin · Computer Science · History · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
Subaltern straits
Future of US-China Relations
Can Democratic Consolidation Make a Country Less Secure? The Case of Taiwan
Support for Taiwan in the US House of Representatives
New Presidents Adjust Old Policies
US Taiwan Policy of Strategic Ambiguity
Drawing a line in the Taiwan Strait
Paradiplomacy as a response to international isolation
Seizing the Opportunity for Change in the Taiwan Strait
The Future of U.S.-China Relations
Meeting the China challenge
From Strategic Ambiguity to Maximum Pressure? Explaining the Logic of the US Taiwan Policy in the Post-Cold War Era
The non‐consensus 1992 consensus
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,52 |
| Citation span | 2001 - 2024 (24) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |