Strategic use of English quantifiers in the reporting of quantitative information
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11273092 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Vinicius Macuch Silva (0000-0002-3370-4157, University of Birmingham, corresponding author), Alexandra Lorson (0000-0001-5393-0699, University of Groningen), Michael Franke (0000-0001-9670-8510, University of Tübingen), Chris Cummins (0000-0001-8708-4515, Linguistics and English Language, University of Edinburgh), Bronwyn Winter (0000-0001-6036-6774, University of Birmingham) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 498-523 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Discourse Processes (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0163-853X • E-ISSN: 1532-6950 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0163853x.2024.2413311 |
| OpenAlex | W4403769726 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 26 |
This study investigates how quantifiers are used strategically to serve differ-ent argumentative goals. We report two experiments on how English speak-ers describe the results of school exams when being instructed to frame theirdescriptions either as a good or bad outcome. Experiment 1 shows thatparticipants have clear preferences for specific quantifier combinations inthis task. Experiment 2 shows that, in situations where producing descrip-tions that meet one’s argumentative goals is difficult (i.e. framing very badoutcomes positively), participants tend to use quantifiers that are informa-tionally weaker than other salient alternatives. Experiment 2 also shows thatpeople have a bias to frame outcomes positively, even when the task asksthem to frame them negatively. Put together, these results shed light on thequestion of how language users strategically explore different linguisticstrategies to communicate quantity in pragmatically favorable ways, includ-ing how quantifiers are used vis-`a-vis other lexical expressions of quantity
Linguistics · Natural language processing · Computer Science · Lexicography and Language Studies · linguistics and terminology studies
Scalar Implicatures
The Split-Apply-Combine Strategy for Data Analysis
Can Emotions Capture the Elusive Gain-Loss Framing Effect? A Meta-Analysis
Generalized quantifiers and natural language
Human language reveals a universal positivity bias
Welcome to the Tidyverse
BRMS
Q-Adjectives and the Semantics of Quantity
Rational Interpretation of Numerical Quantity in Argumentative Contexts
A few or several ? Construal, quantity, and argumentativity
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |