Conceptual Effects of Audience Design in Human–Computer and Human–Human Dialogue
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11273157 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christopher Schmader (Northwestern University), William S Horton (0000-0002-5801-1971, Northwestern University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 170-190 |
| Publication date | 2019-02-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Discourse Processes (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0163-853X • E-ISSN: 1532-6950 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0163853x.2017.1411716 |
| OpenAlex | W2779448014 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 38 |
Speakers in conversation often tailor referring expressions in ways that reflect beliefs about the knowledge and perspectives of specific addressees. In this study we examined whether such audience design can influence speakers’ conceptualizations of referents beyond the conversation. In a Wizard-of-Oz paradigm, participants identified novel images either for an ostensible computer dialogue application or for a human partner as part of a referential communication task. Subsequently, they independently sorted the task images into discrete groups. Consistent with audience design, when interacting with the computer a greater proportion of participants’ descriptions in the dialogue task focused on literal, geometric features compared with descriptions for the human partner. Importantly, participants’ postdialogue sorts were also more shape-based after human–computer interaction. Different ways of attending to objects for communicative purposes can affect how speakers construe objects for themselves
Affect (linguistics · Cognitive psychology · Computer-mediated communication · Conversation · Human communication · Human–computer interaction · Linguistics · Literal (mathematical logic · Task (project management · Wizard · Wizard of oz · World Wide Web · Communication · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Speech and dialogue systems
Rethinking linguistic relativity
Contexts of Accommodation
Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue
Audience Design in Meaning and Reference
The role of beliefs in lexical alignment
Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods
Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding
References in conversation between experts and novices.
Common ground at the understanding of demonstrative reference
Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Do (and Say) as I Say
Users Request Help From Advisory Systems With Simple and Restricted Language
Lexical Entrainment in Written Discourse
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research
Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding
Elements of Discourse Understanding
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |