Three ways to compute accurately the probability of the referendum paradox
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11285947 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dominique Lepelley (0000-0001-6897-8628, Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de la Réunion, corresponding author), Vincent Merlin (0000-0002-5403-6602, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Jean-Louis Rouet, Jean‐Louis Rouet (0000-0002-3430-0015, Institut des Sciences de la Terre) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 28-33 |
| Publication date | 2011-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Mathematical Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0165-4896 • E-ISSN: 1879-3118 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.04.006 |
| OpenAlex | W2082420718 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 3 |
Econometrics · Economics · Limiting · Mathematical economics · Political science · Referendum · Computer Science · Economic Policies and Impacts · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Engineering · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law · Mathematics
The likelihood of the referendum paradox for a given referendum result
Le mécanisme optimal de vote au sein du conseil des représentants d’un système fédéral
Le scrutin binominal paritaire
A note on the direct democracy deficit in two-tier voting
Testing Penrose Limit Theorem
The architecture of the Electoral College, the House size effect, and the referendum paradox
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.43 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2025 (14) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |