Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Partisan Divergence in Fertility Change Before and During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Florida

Bibliographic Data

ID11291096
AuthorsH M Rackin (0000-0002-9017-6637, Louisiana State University, corresponding author), C Gibson-Davis (0000-0002-8286-6494, Public Policy Institute of California), Christina M Gibson-Davis, Courtney E Williams (0000-0002-7173-8147, The University of Texas at Austin), Dustin Hughes, D J Hughes (0000-0002-7307-5690, Western Washington University), Seunghwan Yoo (0009-0001-2289-6595), Seung‐Hwan Yoo (0000-0003-1135-4931, Louisiana State University)
Year2025
Volume44
Issue5
Publication date2025-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePopulation Research and Policy Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0167-5923 • E-ISSN: 1573-7829
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11113-025-09972-0
OpenAlexW4414183970
LanguageEN
References cited45

Motivated by political-based differences in pandemic perceptions, this study analyzed whether Republican- and Democratic-leaning counties exhibited differential fertility shifts, leading to a partisan fertility gap. As COVID-19 emerged, the political right dismissed the threat of the virus, while the political left emphasized it as a major crisis. These contrasting views may have led to diverging fertility responses between those living in Democratic- and Republican-leaning areas. Using county-level data from Florida, difference-in-difference models predicted quarterly change in fertility rates between 2018 and 2022. Models estimated the partisan fertility gap (e.g., Republican-Democratic difference in fertility rate changes relative to before the pandemic) as a function of 2020 Trump vote share. The partisan fertility gap widened during the pandemic’s early months, as fertility in Republican-leaning counties declined less than in Democratic-leaning counties. This gap was only observed for White women and was robust to controlling on time-varying potential confounders (unemployment rate and racial composition changes). The partisan gap was short-lived, however. Results suggest that politically-charged contexts where would-be-parents lived may have affected pandemic-induced fertility shocks and demonstrates the need to understand fertility changes in the context of the broader political environment—a vital endeavor given record-low fertility and unprecedented political polarization in the United States

Context (archaeology · Fertility · Pandemic · Politics · Sub-replacement fertility · Total fertility rate · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

  • Understanding Family Change and Variation

    Open Access•Jennifer Johnson‐Hanks, Jennifer A Johnson-Hanks et al.•Understanding Family Change and…•2011

  • Uncivil Agreement

    L Mason•Uncivil agreement•2018

  • Polarization and public health

    Open Access•Hunt Allcott, Levi Boxell et al.•Journal of Public Economics•2020

  • Uncertainty and Narratives of the Future

    Open Access•D Vignoli, Giacomo Bazzani et al.•Analyzing Contemporary Fertility•2020

  • The Emergence of Covid-19 in the US

    Sarah E Gollust, Rebekah H Nagler et al.•Journal of Health Politics Policy…•2020

  • Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Shana Kushner Gadarian, W Goodman et al.•PLoS ONE•2021

  • Fertility attitudes of highly educated youth

    Open Access•T Karabchuk, Hermann Dülmer et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2022

  • The impact of narratives of the future on fertility intentions in Norway

    Open Access•Trude Lappegård, Axel Peter Kristensen et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2022

  • The US Covid-19 baby bust and rebound

    Open Access•Melissa S Kearney, Phillip B Levine•Journal of Population Economics•2023

  • Narratives of the Future Affect Fertility

    Open Access•D Vignoli, Alessandra Minello et al.•European Journal of Population /…•2022

  • Do Pregnancy Intentions Matter? A Research Note Revisiting Relationships Among Pregnancy, Birth, and Maternal Outcomes

    Open Access•Nicholas D E Mark, K Cowan•Demography•2022

  • Fertility and Media Narratives of the Economy

    Open Access•Raffaele Guetto, Maria Francesca Morabito et al.•Demography•2023

  • Voter Migration and the Geographic Sorting of the American Electorate

    Wendy K Tam Cho, James G Gimpel et al.•Annals of the Association of…•2013

  • The Home as a Political Fortress

    Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Political Homophily in Social Relationships

    Gregory A Huber, N Malhotra•The Journal of Politics•2017

  • Reversing the Causal Arrow

    Open Access•Michele F Margolis•Political Psychology•2022

  • The Dating Preferences of Liberals and Conservatives

    Open Access•Casey A Klofstad, Casey Klofstad et al.•Political Behavior•2013

  • Party Polarization in American Politics

    Geoffrey C Layman, Thomas M Carsey et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2006

  • The Effects of the Great Recession on Family Structure and Fertility

    Open Access•Andrew J Cherlin, Andrew Cherlin et al.•The Annals of the American…•2013

  • Seeking politically compatible neighbors? The role of neighborhood partisan composition in residential sorting

    Open Access•James G Gimpel, Iris S Hui et al.•Political Geography•2015

  • A Polarized Environment

    Open Access•Daniel J Coffey, Patricia Hallam Joseph•American Behavioral Scientist•2013

  • Fertility in a Pandemic

    Open Access•Jenna Nobles, Alison Gemmill et al.•Population and Development Review•2024

  • Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Anton Gollwitzer, Cameron Martel et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2020

  • The politics of mask-wearing

    Open Access•Dannagal G Young, Huma Rasheed et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2022

  • Effects of the Covid-19 Recession on the US Labor Market

    Open Access•Stefania Albanesi, Jiyeon Kim et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2021

  • Women's employment and fertility in a global perspective (1960-2015)

    Open Access•J A Behrman, Julia Behrman et al.•Demographic Research•2020

  • Youth's political identity and fertility desires

    Open Access•H M Rackin, C Gibson-Davis•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2024

  • Fertility Preferences and Cognition

    Open Access•E A Marshall, H Shepherd•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2018

  • The Great Recession, Fertility, and Uncertainty

    Open Access•Daniel Schneider•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2015

  • Perceived Economic Uncertainty and Fertility

    Open Access•Barbara Hofmann, Katrin Hohmeyer•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2013

  • Spreading Uncertainty, Shrinking Birth Rates

    Open Access•Chiara Ludovica Comolli, D Vignoli•European Sociological Review•2021

  • Social context of first birth timing in a rapidly changing rural setting

    Open Access•Dirgha J Ghimire•Social Science Research•2017

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae