States and changes-of-state in the semantics of result roots
Evidence from resultative constructions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11293052 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jianrong Yu (0000-0002-3971-6749, KU Leuven), Josep Ausensi (0000-0002-0193-6594, Universitat Rovira i Virgili), Ryan Walter Smith (0009-0003-5627-3833, University of Manchester, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1589-1628 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0167-806X • E-ISSN: 1573-0859 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11049-023-09570-9 |
| OpenAlex | W4321615804 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 41 |
A major challenge for event structural theories that decompose verbs into event templates and roots relates to the syntactic distribution of roots and what types of event structures roots can be integrated into. Ontological Approaches propose roots fall into semantic classes, such as manner versus result, which determine root distribution (Rappaport Hovav and Levin 1998, 2010). Free Distribution Approaches , in contrast, hold that root distribution is not constrained by semantic content and roots are free to integrate into various types of event structures (Borer 2005; Acedo-Matellán and Mateu 2014). We focus on two different classes of verbs classified as result verbs in Rappaport Hovav and Levin’s (1998, 2010) sense and their ability to appear in resultative constructions. We build on Beavers and Koontz-Garboden’s (2012, 2020) proposal that the roots underlying these verbs fall into two classes: property concept roots, which denote relations between individuals and states, and change-of-state roots, which on our proposal, denote relations between individuals and events of change. We show that change-of-state roots, but not property concept roots, are able to appear in the modifier position of resultative constructions by providing naturally occurring examples of such resultatives. Combining the proposed lexical semantics of these two classes of roots with a reformulation of an Ontological Approach solely dependent on a root’s semantic type, we show that this analysis makes novel and accurate predictions about the possibility of the two classes of roots appearing in resultative constructions and the range of interpretations available when change-of-state roots are integrated into resultative event structure templates
Causative · Epistemology · Linguistics · Metaphysics · Philosophy of language · Rappaport · Resultative · Semantic property · Syntax · Verb · Computer Science · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations
Structuring Sense
Word Meaning and Montague Grammar
Lexical Plurals
Events and Plurality
Introducing Arguments
Verb Meaning and the Lexicon
Structuring Sense Volume 2
Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure
The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically
The algebra of events
Severing the External Argument from its Verb
The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality
Where have All the Adjectives Gone?
The different readings of wieder 'again'
Resultatives and low depictives in English
Locality Constraints on the Interpretation of Roots
On affectedness
The Projection of Arguments
Semantics and Morphosyntactic Variation
Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted
Manner and Result in the Roots of Verbal Meaning
Concealed Causatives
Double Objects Again
On the Structure of Resultative Participles in English
Small clause results
Thematic roles and their role in semantic interpretation
States and changes of state
Result verbs, scalar change, and the typology of motion verbs
An Event Structure Account of English Resultatives
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |